A three-step structure for feedback: state a neutral observation ("What"), explain its impact ("So What"), and suggest a collaborative next step ("Now What"). This focuses on the work, not the person, making the feedback more likely to be received well and acted upon.

An employee's performance drop is rarely due to a single cause. A manager should systematically investigate four distinct areas: Communication (do they know *what* to do?), Training (do they know *how*?), Motivation (do they *want* to?), and Circumstances (is something *blocking* them?).

To help your team overcome their own performance blockers, shift your coaching from their actions to their thinking. Ask questions like, "What were you thinking that led you to that approach?" This helps them uncover the root belief driving their behavior, enabling more profound and lasting change than simple behavioral correction.

In a supportive culture, managing underperformance starts with co-authored goals upstream. When results falter, the conversation should be a diagnostic inquiry focused on removing roadblocks. This shifts the focus from the person's failure to the problem that's hindering their success, making tough conversations productive.

When an employee presents a problem they should be able to solve, resist providing a solution. Instead, return ownership by asking, "What do you think you should do about that?" This simple question forces critical thinking and breaks the team's dependency on you for answers.

When an employee isn't meeting expectations, it's rarely due to lack of effort. It's typically because they don't know *what* to do, *why* it's important to the larger picture, or *how* to do it. Addressing these three points provides clarity and removes roadblocks before assuming a performance issue.

The belief that people fail due to lack of will leads to blame. Shifting to 'people do well if they can' reframes failure as a skill gap, not a will gap. This moves your role from enforcer to helper, focusing you on identifying and building missing skills.

When evaluating talent, the biggest red flag is "hand-waving." If you ask a direct question about their area of responsibility and they can't give a crisp, clear explanation, they likely lack true understanding. Top performers know their craft and can explain the "why" behind their actions.

When giving feedback, structure it in three parts. "What" is the specific observation. "So what" explains its impact on you or the situation. "Now what" provides a clear, forward-looking suggestion for change. This framework ensures feedback is understood and actionable.