We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
When delivering criticism or discussing poor performance, sandwich the negative content between positive bookends. Start with praise, address the tough issues, but always conclude on a positive, forward-looking note. Jacobs emphasizes that how a meeting ends psychologically frames the entire experience for participants.
A three-step structure for feedback: state a neutral observation ("What"), explain its impact ("So What"), and suggest a collaborative next step ("Now What"). This focuses on the work, not the person, making the feedback more likely to be received well and acted upon.
While often maligned, research found the "feedback sandwich" (positive-negative-positive) is effective. However, the crucial element is starting with a compliment or expression of respect. This primes the recipient to be more receptive to the difficult feedback that follows. The positive end is less critical.
Optimize feedback's psychological impact. Deliver negative feedback verbally and in-person to avoid misinterpretation of tone. Follow up on positive feedback in writing, even if delivered verbally, because people cherish and share written praise with friends and family, amplifying its effect.
The objective of a tough conversation isn't just to deliver bad news but to leave the recipient feeling better because an issue is now on the table and can be addressed. Honesty delivered with a coaching mindset builds trust and prevents the damaging shock of a surprise negative evaluation later.
Dedicate the final minute of a meeting to a meta-discussion about its effectiveness. Publicly praise specific actions that kept the conversation on track or fostered collaboration. This rewards positive participation and signals to the team what effective meeting behavior looks like, improving future meetings.
Instead of creating anxiety, frame a tough conversation by affirming your shared ability to handle it. A phrase like, "I need to have a difficult conversation, and I know that we can handle it," transforms a potential conflict into a collaborative challenge.
When giving feedback, structure it in three parts. "What" is the specific observation. "So what" explains its impact on you or the situation. "Now what" provides a clear, forward-looking suggestion for change. This framework ensures feedback is understood and actionable.
To effectively set the tone of a meeting, first highlight a common negative behavior (e.g., "competitive mindsets"). Then, immediately contrast it with the positive, collaborative frame you want to adopt. This makes your proposed approach seem more valuable and aligns the room toward your goal.
To prevent defensiveness when giving critical feedback, managers should explicitly state their positive intent. Saying "I'm giving this because I care about you and your career" shifts the focus from a personal attack to a supportive act of leadership aimed at helping them grow.
Frame difficult conversations by separating the problematic behavior (e.g., being late) from the person's identity (e.g., being lazy). This 'good person who is struggling with X' approach prevents defensiveness and allows for a productive discussion about the issue.