We often assume our message is received as intended, but this is a frequent point of failure in communication. The only thing that matters is what the listener understands. To ensure clarity and avoid conflict, proactively ask the other person to reflect back what they heard you say.
Related Insights
Effective listening requires 'grace'—the permission to listen beyond the literal words for the underlying emotional need. A direct question about performance might not be a request for a critical review but a plea for reassurance. Misreading this subtext can damage rapport.
Many conversations fail because we don't truly listen. Instead, we just pause to formulate our next attack. This isn't listening; it's strategizing. This defensive approach erodes connection and understanding, costing us relationships and opportunities because it's hard to hate someone you truly understand.
This powerful maxim highlights a core cause of conflict in teams and relationships. When you expect someone to do something without clearly communicating it, you are setting them up to fail and preparing yourself to be resentful when they inevitably do. This frames clear communication not as a preference, but as a mandatory prerequisite for avoiding bitterness and maintaining healthy dynamics.
The foundation of clear communication isn't eloquence but active listening. The goal is to understand the other person's perspective before formulating a response, which also helps prevent reactive, stress-induced replies and makes others feel heard.
Before giving feedback or answering a complex question, ask a clarifying question. This isn't just for the other person's benefit; it's a strategic tool to help you target your own response, ensuring it's relevant and concise.
Paraphrasing is more than just a tool for checking comprehension. Citing research from Harvard's Alison Wood Brooks, the speaker notes it also deepens your connection with the other person. The act of listening in order to paraphrase also forces you to focus more intently on the core message.
In disagreements, the objective isn't to prove the other person wrong or "win" the argument. The true goal is to achieve mutual understanding. This fundamental shift in perspective transforms a confrontational dynamic into a collaborative one, making difficult conversations more productive.
True connection requires humility. Instead of trying to imagine another's viewpoint ("perspective taking"), a more effective approach is to actively seek it out through questions and tentative statements ("perspective getting"). This avoids misreads and shows genuine interest.
When people don't understand your point, it's often a sign that you are not meeting them where they are. Instead of pushing forward impatiently, you must go back to their starting point, re-establish shared assumptions, or reframe the message from their perspective.
The "looping" technique—repeating what you heard and asking "Did I get that right?"—is effective in conflicts even if your interpretation is incorrect. The act of trying to understand and giving them power to correct you demonstrates genuine intent, making the other person feel heard and reducing defensiveness.
