We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
During their seed round pitch, Square's team led with a slide detailing 140 potential failure points. This radical candor disarmed VCs, shifting the conversation from a defensive pitch to a collaborative brainstorming session on how to overcome those obstacles, resulting in dozens of term sheets.
Instead of being discouraged by over 100 rejections, Canva's founder treated each one as a data point. She added new slides to her pitch deck to pre-emptively address every objection—such as market size or competition—making the pitch stronger and more compelling with each "no."
Applying the "weird if it didn't work" framework to fundraising means shifting the narrative. Your goal is to construct a story where the market opportunity is so massive and your team's approach is so compelling that an investor's decision *not* to participate would feel like an obvious miss.
Merge's founder views the seed round not just as a capital raise but as a test of street smarts and sales skills. How a founder manages intros, creates FOMO, and navigates the "dating game" with VCs is a direct indicator of their future success in acquiring actual customers.
A venture capitalist's first question to a founder is about a major failure. An inability to answer ends the meeting, as it signals a lack of experience in confronting and overcoming adversity, a crucial skill for leading a startup.
After personal tragedies caused a seed round to collapse, the founder's openness with investors and decision to self-fund the company demonstrated extreme resilience. This convinced his team to stay and even brought back previous investors, showcasing that founder conviction is a powerful signal.
Early-stage founders should reframe their pitching goal. The first conversation is not about securing investment but about being compelling and clear enough to make the VC want a follow-up. This mindset shifts the focus from an exhaustive data dump to telling a concise, memorable story that sparks interest.
For deep tech startups lacking traditional revenue metrics, the fundraising pitch should frame the market as inevitable if the technology works. This shifts the investor's bet from market validation to the team's ability to execute on a clear technical challenge, a more comfortable risk for specialized investors.
When investors say "no," don't just accept it. Reframe their decision as a potential mistake, comparing it to common investor errors like overlooking a great founder due to market concerns. This tactic, which turned two rejections into $12M, repositions you from supplicant to a confident peer and can reopen the conversation.
During a tough fundraising process, founders should remove emotion and ask themselves a critical question: 'Would I invest my entire personal fortune into this right now?' Answering 'yes' with rational conviction is the key to weathering rejections and ultimately persuading an anchor investor to make the first bet.
Great founders turn a pitch into a collaborative discussion by asking investors to identify business weaknesses. This signals curiosity, strength, and a desire for genuine feedback over just presenting a perfect picture. It demonstrates a coachable leader who is focused on gathering data to improve.