Merge's founder views the seed round not just as a capital raise but as a test of street smarts and sales skills. How a founder manages intros, creates FOMO, and navigates the "dating game" with VCs is a direct indicator of their future success in acquiring actual customers.
Related Insights
A massive valuation for a "seed" round can be misleading. Often, insiders have participated in several unannounced, cheaper tranches. The headline number is just the final, most expensive tier, used to create FOMO and set a high watermark for new investors.
Instead of a functional prototype, Mirror's founder raised a seed round with a "smoke and mirrors" version: an animated video behind one-way glass. This focused on selling the *feeling* and brand experience to investors, proving demand before spending capital on complex engineering.
Early-stage founders, especially those who are analytically minded, must resist the comfort of spreadsheets and data. The most crucial activity is direct engagement and selling, even if it feels uncomfortable. No amount of analysis can replace the impact of the founder personally championing the product.
Investors like Stacy Brown-Philpot and Aileen Lee now expect founders to demonstrate a clear, rapid path to massive scale early on. The old assumption that the next funding round would solve for scalability is gone; proof is required upfront.
A founder credited his accelerator's grueling schedule—pitching to 20 investors weekly with harsh feedback—as a transformative experience. This intense repetition wasn't just for fundraising; it was a powerful training ground that polished his core sales and communication skills for all future business dealings.
Prepared's founder rejected running a formal fundraising process. Instead, he had infrequent 'coffee chats' with investors to share progress. This built relationships and momentum, leading to preemptive term sheets and much faster closes without the distraction of a full-time fundraise.
Investors like Reid Hoffman see the fundraising negotiation not as a zero-sum game, but as a crucial test of a founder's character, realism, and suitability as a long-term partner. Unreasonable or unrealistic demands, even in a hot deal, are a negative signal that can kill an investment.
Bootstrapping is often a capital constraint that limits a founder's full potential. Conversely, venture capital removes this constraint, acting as a forcing function that immediately reveals a founder's true capabilities in recruiting, product, and fundraising. It's the equivalent of 'going pro' by facing the raw question: 'How good am I?'
The most effective fundraising strategy isn't a rigid, time-boxed "process." Instead, elite founders build genuine relationships with target VCs over months. When it's time to raise, the groundwork is laid, turning the fundraise into a quick, casual commitment rather than a competitive, game-driven event.
