For hyper-successful women at the apex of their fields, the optimal mating strategy is to choose a partner from a completely different 'status game' (e.g., an entertainer marrying an athlete). This avoids direct professional comparison and competition, allowing for a relationship based on complementary, non-overlapping forms of prestige and competence.

To counteract the "suffocation model," couples can strengthen their bond by not relying on it for every need. Building a diversified "social portfolio"—turning to different friends, family, and hobbies for various forms of emotional support and fulfillment—reduces pressure on the marriage and improves overall happiness.

Professional success and financial literacy, as seen in the case of lawyer Patti Asai, do not grant immunity from financial abuse. Societal pressure on women to secure a male partner can override their professional judgment, leading them to accept controlling behaviors they would otherwise reject.

Your choice of a life partner has a greater impact on your financial future than any career or investment. Financial incompatibility is the number one reason for divorce, underscoring that marriage is a financial contract at its core, where alignment on money matters more than romantic feelings for long-term stability.

Contrary to common advice, high expectations aren't inherently bad for marriage. They create a bifurcation: couples who invest enough to meet these expectations achieve unprecedented levels of fulfillment, while those who can't are often unhappier than couples from past eras with lower expectations.

Historically, people lived in communities with extended kin networks that met various social and emotional needs. Today, with the rise of the nuclear family and social isolation, individuals expect their romantic partner to be their stable companion, passionate lover, and entire support system—an impossible set of demands for one person to meet.

Historically, marriage was a pragmatic institution for resource sharing, political alliances, and acquiring in-laws. The now-dominant concept of marrying for love and personal attraction is a relatively recent cultural development, primarily from the 18th and 19th centuries.

Universal childcare, typically framed as a feminist policy, could be profoundly beneficial for men. By alleviating financial stress on young families, it could reduce divorce rates. This is critical as men are significantly more prone to self-harm and negative outcomes following a divorce, making family economic stability a key men's issue.

Psychologist Eli Finkel's "suffocation model" suggests contemporary couples expect their partners to provide not just love, but also personal growth and self-actualization—needs once met by an entire community. This overload of expectations can damage a relationship if not met with sufficient investment of time and energy.