Sam Altman's verbal response to a question about OpenAI's finances was reasonable, but his negative body language and audible sigh—perceptible only on video—completely changed the message's reception. This highlights how non-verbal cues in video interviews can undermine a leader's intended message, a critical lesson in the age of multimedia communication.

Related Insights

There are no universal cues for lying. Instead of assuming a gesture like crossed arms means someone is being deceptive, view it as a change in their state. This change is a signal to become curious and ask clarifying questions.

Face-to-face contact provides a rich stream of non-verbal cues (tone, expression, body language) that our brains use to build empathy. Digital platforms strip these away, impairing our ability to connect, understand others' emotions, and potentially fostering undue hostility and aggression online.

Since communication is overwhelmingly non-verbal (only 6% words), any feeling of desperation from a salesperson is easily detected. This neediness repels buyers because it signals the focus is on the seller's quota, not the buyer's journey, instantly eroding trust and killing the deal.

Many professionals avoid video because they dislike watching themselves. Instead of ignoring this discomfort, lean into it. Methodically re-watching your videos is the fastest way to identify and correct awkward delivery quirks, like repetitive blinking or verbal tics. This self-analysis is a critical step to becoming a more polished presenter.

Your physical energy is a key non-verbal signal of competence and reliability. Potential hires, investors, and partners subconsciously assess your energy to gauge if you can deliver on promises. Low energy can communicate untrustworthiness, causing you to lose high-caliber opportunities.

Beyond transcription, advanced AI tools can analyze an interviewer's live performance. They offer feedback on tonality, vocabulary, use of open vs. closed questions, and even body language, turning the AI into a powerful tool for improving human soft skills and communication.

In a high-stakes interview, the interviewee used a 'pregnant pause' and spoke slowly instead of using filler words. This projected thoughtfulness and control. In contrast, the interviewer's rapid speech and verbal fillers undermined her credibility and ability to connect with her subject.

Some leaders are powerful in a small room but appear wooden on camera. The ability to project charisma through a lens is a separate skill from in-person magnetism. This "television charisma" is becoming increasingly crucial for political viability, and the two are not interchangeable.

In virtual settings, the lack of physical presence causes people to "over-index" on the few non-verbal cues available, like facial expressions. A leader's innocuous action, such as rubbing their face, can be misinterpreted as negativity. Leaders must be hyper-aware that their virtual body language is under a microscope.

Communication extends far beyond words. How you carry yourself—your posture, demeanor, and overall presence—is a constant broadcast that communicates your value and influence. Citing WNBA icon Lisa Leslie, Chiney Ogwumike argues this "physical communication" is as critical to one's professional brand as their spoken words.