When someone is upset, directly ask if they want to be "heard" (emotional support), "helped" (practical solutions), or "hugged" (social connection). This simple heuristic clarifies their needs and prevents the conversational mismatch of offering solutions when empathy is desired.

Related Insights

In relationships with a power differential, leaders default to problem-solving. A more effective approach is to first ask a question like, "What does this diagnosis mean to you?" This addresses the subordinate's emotional and social anxieties, making them more receptive to practical advice.

The Nonviolent Communication framework (Observations, Feelings, Needs, Request) provides a script for difficult conversations. It structures your communication to focus on objective facts and your personal emotional experience, rather than blaming the other person. This approach minimizes defensiveness and fosters empathy.

Effective problem-solving ('Plan B') follows a sequence. First, genuinely understand the other's perspective (Empathy). Second, share your own concerns using 'and,' not 'but.' Only then, invite them to brainstorm a mutually satisfactory solution together.

People engage in three types of conversations: practical (problem-solving), emotional (empathy), or social (identity). When participants are in different modes—like one offering solutions when the other wants validation—the connection fails. Recognizing and aligning these modes is key to effective communication.

People often confuse empathy with agreement. In collaborative problem-solving, empathy is a tool for understanding. You can completely disagree with someone's perspective while still working to accurately understand it, which is the necessary first step to finding a solution.

Instead of searching for the perfect words, which don't exist, it's more effective to be honest about your uncertainty. Simply say "I'm here for you" and then offer a practical, authentic act of support based on your own skills and passions, like cooking a meal or walking their dog.

True connection requires humility. Instead of trying to imagine another's viewpoint ("perspective taking"), a more effective approach is to actively seek it out through questions and tentative statements ("perspective getting"). This avoids misreads and shows genuine interest.

Genuine rapport isn't built on small talk; it's built by recognizing and addressing the other person's immediate emotional state. To connect, you must first help them with what's on their mind before introducing your own agenda.

The generic offer "let me know if I can help" rarely gets a response. Asking "What does support look like right now?" is a more effective, direct question. It gently shifts the burden to the other person to define their needs, making them more likely to accept help and reducing resentment.

Saying "I understand" is counterproductive. You can understand someone's words, but you cannot truly know their unique emotional experience. The phrase often shifts the focus to your own experience, preventing the other person from feeling heard.