When facing a significant customer service issue with a brand you care about, bypass standard channels and email the founder or CEO. Frame your feedback constructively. High-level leaders are often disconnected from front-line issues and appreciate direct, actionable feedback, leading to white-glove service and a faster, more favorable resolution.

While customer feedback is vital for identifying problems (e.g., 40% of 911 calls are non-urgent), customers rarely envision the best solution (e.g., an AI voice agent). A founder's role is to absorb the problem, then push for the technologically superior solution, even if it initially faces resistance.

Brainstorming cannot reveal the true friction in your customer experience. Following JetBlue's example, leaders must regularly become their own customers. This practice uncovers how high-level decisions inadvertently create flaws in the customer journey that are invisible from the boardroom.

Systematically identify frustrating moments in the customer journey, like waiting for the check. Instead of just minimizing the pain, reinvent these moments to be delightful. Guidara’s example of offering a complimentary bottle of cognac with the bill turns a negative into a generous, memorable gesture.

Many companies claim customer-centricity, but few are willing to provide value to a degree that seems unbalanced. This relentless focus on the end-user, whether in product, service, or content, is a rare and powerful competitive advantage that builds a sustainable brand.

Instead of focusing on call center efficiency metrics like average handle time, James Dyson reframed the interaction entirely. He instructed his team to treat it as an honor when a customer reaches out, fostering a culture of deep service that builds immense trust and brand loyalty.

Companies intentionally create friction ("sludge")—like long waits and complex processes—not from incompetence, but to discourage customers from pursuing claims or services they are entitled to. This is the insidious counterpart to behavioral "nudge" theory.

When a customer has an issue, the instinct can be to defend your process or prove they are mistaken. This is flawed. The focus should be on resolving the situation and making the customer feel heard, not on who was technically correct. The goal is to solve, not to win the argument.

Founders often fear scaling a service business because they believe only they can provide the 'personal touch.' This is an ego-driven bottleneck. The correct approach is to hire, accept that mistakes will happen, fire underperformers, and use sincere apologies and refunds to repair client relationships. Service failures are a predictable cost of scaling.