Lobster Capital intentionally distributed small proceeds from a failed company instead of reinvesting. This signals a serious commitment to liquidity and DPI (Distributions to Paid-in Capital) to Limited Partners, building trust early in a fund's life when returns are years away.
Related Insights
By defending the pro rata rights of early backers against new, powerful investors, founders play an "infinite game." This builds a reputation for fairness that compounds over time, attracting higher-quality partners and investors in future rounds.
Limited Partners should resist pressuring VCs for early exits to lock in DPI. The best companies compound value at incredible rates, making it optimal to hold winners. Instead, LPs should manage portfolio duration and liquidity by building a balanced portfolio of early-stage, growth, and secondary fund investments.
A common mistake for emerging managers is pitching LPs solely on the potential for huge returns. Institutional LPs are often more concerned with how a fund's specific strategy, size, and focus align with their overall portfolio construction. Demonstrating a clear, disciplined strategy is more compelling than promising an 8x return.
To truly understand a potential financial partner, the Chomps team went beyond the supplied references. They found a founder whose company didn't succeed under the PE firm's investment. His positive review of the partner's character, despite the negative outcome, provided the most powerful signal of trust.
Many sub-$500M venture funds are over-invested and under-reserved. While venture capitalists like Josh Wolfe predict a 50% failure rate for these "minnows," the Limited Partners (LPs) who fund them are even more bearish, believing the involuntary extinction rate will be closer to 90%.
After poor performance, a massive GP commit (like Tiger's $400M) is the ultimate signal of conviction. It aligns incentives and proves the manager's belief in a new strategy, acting as a "truth serum" for LPs by showing action, not just words.
Seed-focused funds have a powerful, non-obvious advantage over multi-stage giants: incentive alignment. A seed fund's goal is to maximize the next round's valuation for the founder. A multi-stage firm, hoping to lead the next round themselves, is implicitly motivated to keep that valuation lower, creating a conflict of interest.
In frothy markets with multi-billion dollar valuations, a key learned behavior from 2021 is for VCs to sell 10-20% of their stake during a large funding round. This provides early liquidity and distributions (DPI) to LPs, who are grateful for the cash back, and de-risks the fund's position.
After discovering that buyers of their portfolio companies were achieving 3x returns, TA shifted its strategy. Instead of selling 100%, they now often sell partial stakes. This provides liquidity to LPs and de-risks the investment while allowing TA to capture significant upside from the company's continued compounding growth.
