In VC, where being wrong is the norm (80%+ of the time), the most critical trait is not righteousness but deep curiosity. This learning-first mindset is what uncovers non-obvious opportunities and allows investors to see future market shifts before they become mainstream, according to True Ventures' Jon Callaghan.
Related Insights
Venture capitalists thrive by adopting one of two distinct personas: the "in the flow" consensus-driver focused on speed and connections, or the "out of the flow" contrarian focused on deep, isolated work. Attempting to straddle both paths leads to failure.
The most successful venture investors share two key traits: they originate investments from a first-principles or contrarian standpoint, and they possess the conviction to concentrate significant capital into their winning portfolio companies as they emerge.
True investment courage isn't just writing the first check; it's being willing to invest again in a category after a previous investment failed. Many investors become biased and write off entire sectors after a single bad experience, but enduring VCs understand that timing and team make all the difference.
Even professional venture capitalists struggle to predict their breakout hits. Morgan Housel notes that at his fund, the companies that became their biggest winners were not the ones they initially expected to succeed, while their 'obvious' bets often failed.
Contrary to conventional wisdom, deep sector expertise can be a liability in venture capital. VC firm Felicis found that none of its 53 unicorn investments were led by an expert in that specific sector. Experts can be anchored to orthodox thinking, while generalists are better able to recognize and back disruptive, first-principles approaches.
Investors naturally develop 'scar tissue' from past failures, leading to increased cynicism that can prevent them from backing ambitious, non-obvious ideas. The best investors intentionally fight this bias by balancing their experience with a 'beginner's mind.' While pure naivete is dangerous, so is excessive cynicism, and finding the intersection between the two is critical for venture success.
When evaluating revolutionary ideas, traditional Total Addressable Market (TAM) analysis is useless. VCs should instead bet on founders with a "world-bending vision" capable of inducing a new market, not just capturing an existing one. Have the humility to admit you can't predict market size and instead back the visionary founder.
Experienced VCs may transition from rigid analytical frameworks to an intuitive search for outliers. Instead of asking if a business plan 'makes sense,' they look for unusual qualities that challenge their worldview and hint at massive potential.
Lonsdale recounts passing on brilliant founders with seemingly terrible ideas, only to watch them pivot and build billion-dollar companies like Cursor. The lesson for early-stage investors is to prioritize backing exceptional, world-class talent, even if their initial concept seems flawed, as they possess the ability to find a winning strategy.
The most successful founders rarely get the solution right on their first attempt. Their strength lies in persistence combined with adaptability. They treat their initial ideas as hypotheses, take in new data, and are willing to change their approach repeatedly to find what works.
