Investors naturally develop 'scar tissue' from past failures, leading to increased cynicism that can prevent them from backing ambitious, non-obvious ideas. The best investors intentionally fight this bias by balancing their experience with a 'beginner's mind.' While pure naivete is dangerous, so is excessive cynicism, and finding the intersection between the two is critical for venture success.
Related Insights
Success brings knowledge, but it also creates a bias against trying unconventional ideas. Early-stage entrepreneurs are "too dumb to know it was dumb," allowing them to take random shots with high upside. Experienced founders often filter these out, potentially missing breakthroughs, fun, and valuable memories.
True investment courage isn't just writing the first check; it's being willing to invest again in a category after a previous investment failed. Many investors become biased and write off entire sectors after a single bad experience, but enduring VCs understand that timing and team make all the difference.
Investors often reject ideas in markets where previous companies failed, a bias they call "scar tissue." This creates an opportunity for founders who can identify a key change—like new AI technology or shifting consumer behavior—that makes a previously impossible idea now viable.
A full understanding of a complex industry's challenges can be paralyzing. The founder of Buildots admitted he wouldn't have started the company if he knew how hard it would be. Naivety allows founders to tackle enormous problems that experienced operators might avoid entirely.
Lacking deep category knowledge fosters the naivety and ambition required for groundbreaking startups. This "beginner's mind" avoids preconceived limitations and allows for truly novel approaches, unlike the incrementalism that experience can sometimes breed. It is a gift, not a curse.
Barry Diller's key lesson from failure is that experience breeds cynicism, which corrupts good decision-making. He advises leaders to constantly fight this tendency and "scrub their instincts clean." Maintaining a degree of naivete is crucial for accurately judging new ideas without being biased by past negative experiences.
Founders shouldn't be deterred by their lack of knowledge. Seeing the full scope of future challenges can be overwhelming. A degree of ignorance allows entrepreneurs to focus on immediate problems and maintain the momentum crucial for survival in the early stages.
The hardest transition from entrepreneur to investor is curbing the instinct to solve problems and imagine "what could be." The best venture deals aren't about fixing a company but finding teams already on a trajectory to succeed, then helping change the slope of that success line on the margin.
Experienced VCs may transition from rigid analytical frameworks to an intuitive search for outliers. Instead of asking if a business plan 'makes sense,' they look for unusual qualities that challenge their worldview and hint at massive potential.
Lacking full knowledge of a startup's immense difficulty can be an advantage for first-time founders. This naivete allows them to commit to ventures they might otherwise avoid if they knew the true challenges ahead, similar to a child fearlessly skiing down a mountain.
