The most successful founders rarely get the solution right on their first attempt. Their strength lies in persistence combined with adaptability. They treat their initial ideas as hypotheses, take in new data, and are willing to change their approach repeatedly to find what works.
Based on a Paul Graham essay, this key distinction separates successful founders from those who fail. Persistent founders are flexible on tactics but relentless on their vision. Obstinate founders rigidly follow their first, least-informed ideas, unable to adapt as they gather new data.
Entrepreneurs often jump between projects, fearing their current one won't succeed in the long run. This is a fatal trap. According to Sam Parr, true focus, while difficult, is the necessary price for an outsized outcome and increases the likelihood of success. Diversification is for preserving wealth, not creating it.
Social media platforms reward outlandish, clickbait statements (e.g., "Triple, Triple, Double, Double is dead") with attention. Founders should be wary of this advice, as it's often disingenuous and designed to grow an influencer's audience rather than provide nuanced, actionable guidance.
Expertise isn't just having "taste." It evolves from exposure (what's good/bad) to analysis (why it's good/bad), and finally to mastery (how to improve it). This framework applies to any creative or intellectual domain, from design to code, helping founders evaluate their own skills.