Lonsdale recounts passing on brilliant founders with seemingly terrible ideas, only to watch them pivot and build billion-dollar companies like Cursor. The lesson for early-stage investors is to prioritize backing exceptional, world-class talent, even if their initial concept seems flawed, as they possess the ability to find a winning strategy.
Related Insights
Silicon Valley's default response to crazy ideas is curiosity, not cynicism, which fosters greater ambition. Crucially, the culture values the experience gained from failure. A founder who raised and lost $50 million is still seen as a valuable bet by investors, a dynamic not found in other ecosystems.
Success brings knowledge, but it also creates a bias against trying unconventional ideas. Early-stage entrepreneurs are "too dumb to know it was dumb," allowing them to take random shots with high upside. Experienced founders often filter these out, potentially missing breakthroughs, fun, and valuable memories.
An investor's best career P&L winners are not immediate yeses. They often involve an initial pass by either the investor or the company. This shows that timing and building relationships over multiple rounds can be more crucial than a single early-stage decision, as a 'missed round' isn't a 'missed company'.
When evaluating investments, Danny Meyer prioritizes leadership quality over the initial concept. He believes a strong leader can pivot and improve a mediocre idea, whereas even a brilliant concept is doomed to fail under poor leadership. This highlights the primacy of execution over ideation for investors.
Since startups lack infinite time and money, an investor's key diligence question is whether the team can learn and iterate fast enough to find a valuable solution before resources run out. This 'learning velocity' is more important than initial traction or a perfect starting plan.
When meeting Cursor's founder, the investor felt an "electric energy" even as the founder was pivoting away from his original idea. This highlights that for elite early-stage investors, the founder's intrinsic drive and potential are the constant to bet on, as ideas will inevitably change.
Founders must have conviction, as even their most sophisticated investors can fundamentally misjudge a bold strategic shift. A Sequoia Capital partner admits their own investors strongly opposed a pivotal move into logistics, demonstrating that founder vision must sometimes override expert consensus.
In dynamic markets like AI, where technology and business models evolve rapidly, the founding team's quality ('the jockey') becomes more critical than the initial business plan ('the horse'). The ability of a small, talented team to pivot and execute on new opportunities is the key determinant of success.
A truly exceptional founder is a talent magnet who will relentlessly iterate until they find a winning model. Rejecting a partnership based on a weak initial idea is a mistake; the founder's talent is the real asset. They will likely pivot to a much bigger opportunity.
Venture capital should focus on what a founder does exceptionally well, rather than penalizing them for past failures or weaknesses. Ben Horowitz uses the Adam Neumann example to illustrate their principle: judge people by their spectacular talents (like building the WeWork brand) and help them manage their flaws, which is a more effective strategy than seeking perfectly flawless individuals.
