Relying on activity metrics like the number of meetings is a flawed way to gauge an MSL's effectiveness, as activity is just "noise." Real impact is measured by tangible changes in the healthcare system, such as improved diagnosis rates or better guideline adherence, requiring a shift away from activity-based KPIs.
A more accurate measurement system can be intimidating because it reveals uncomfortable truths. It may show that seemingly successful activities, like generating high MQL volume, had a negligible impact on actual pipeline. Leaders must prepare to face this exposure to truly improve performance.
Metrics like "Marketing Qualified Lead" are meaningless to the customer. Instead, define key performance indicators around the value a customer receives. A good KPI answers the question: "Have we delivered enough value to convince them to keep going to the next stage?"
True effectiveness comes from focusing on outcomes—real-world results. Many people get trapped measuring inputs (e.g., hours worked) or outputs (e.g., emails sent), which creates a feeling of productivity without guaranteeing actual progress toward goals.
The true value of a Medical Science Liaison (MSL) lies in preparing the entire healthcare system for better care, not just educating individual physicians. This means focusing on systemic changes like improving diagnostic pathways or guideline implementation. Science is only powerful when it moves systems, not just conversations.
Traditional product metrics like DAU are meaningless for autonomous AI agents that operate without user interaction. Product teams must redefine success by focusing on tangible business outcomes. Instead of tracking agent usage, measure "support tickets automatically closed" or "workflows completed."
Shift your team's language from tracking output (e.g., 'deployed XYZ API') to tracking outcomes. Reframe milestones to focus on the business capability you have 'unlocked' for other teams. This small linguistic change reorients the team toward business impact and clarifies your contribution to metrics like NPS.
Open and click rates are ineffective for measuring AI-driven, two-way conversations. Instead, leaders should adopt new KPIs: outcome metrics (e.g., meetings booked), conversational quality (tracking an agent's 'I don't know' rate to measure trust), and, ultimately, customer lifetime value.
Solely measuring a team's output fails to capture the health of their collaboration. A more robust assessment includes tracking goal achievement, team psychological safety, role clarity, and the speed of execution. This provides a holistic view of team effectiveness.
SDR teams often ignore complex dashboards with too many metrics. Simplify reporting to four key numbers: dials (effort), connections (quality), meetings scheduled (conversion), and meetings ran (outcome). This clarity increases trust, accountability, and focus on the activities that drive results.
Shift the team's language and metrics away from output. Instead of celebrating a deployed API, measure and report on what that API enabled for other teams and the business. This directly connects platform work to tangible results and impact.