Open and click rates are ineffective for measuring AI-driven, two-way conversations. Instead, leaders should adopt new KPIs: outcome metrics (e.g., meetings booked), conversational quality (tracking an agent's 'I don't know' rate to measure trust), and, ultimately, customer lifetime value.

Related Insights

Generic evaluation metrics like "helpfulness" or "conciseness" are vague and untrustworthy. A better approach is to first perform manual error analysis to find recurring problems (e.g., "tour scheduling failures"). Then, build specific, targeted evaluations (evals) that directly measure the frequency of these concrete issues, making metrics meaningful.

Instead of focusing solely on conversion rates, measure 'engagement quality'—metrics that signal user confidence, like dwell time, scroll depth, and journey progression. The philosophy is that if you successfully help users understand the content and feel confident, conversions will naturally follow as a positive side effect.

Don't worry if customers know they're talking to an AI. As long as the agent is helpful, provides value, and creates a smooth experience, people don't mind. In many cases, a responsive, value-adding AI is preferable to a slow or mediocre human interaction. The focus should be on quality of service, not on hiding the AI.

Focusing on email open rates can lead to clickbait subject lines and weak copy. Instead, orient your entire outreach strategy around getting a reply. This forces you to write more personalized, engaging content that addresses the recipient's specific pain points, leading to actual conversations, not just vanity metrics.

A key metric for AI coding agent performance is real-time sentiment analysis of user prompts. By measuring whether users say 'fantastic job' or 'this is not what I wanted,' teams get an immediate signal of the agent's comprehension and effectiveness, which is more telling than lagging indicators like bug counts.

To evaluate AI's role in building relationships, marketers must look beyond transactional KPIs. Leading indicators of success include sustained engagement, customers volunteering more information, and recommending the experience to others. These metrics quantify brand trust and empathy—proving the brand is earning belief, not just attention.

Traditional product metrics like DAU are meaningless for autonomous AI agents that operate without user interaction. Product teams must redefine success by focusing on tangible business outcomes. Instead of tracking agent usage, measure "support tickets automatically closed" or "workflows completed."

Effective AI moves beyond a simple monitoring dashboard by translating intelligence directly into action. It should accelerate work tasks, suggest marketing content, identify product issues, and triage service tickets, embedding it as a strategic driver rather than a passive analytics tool.

A primary AI agent interacts with the customer. A secondary agent should then analyze the conversation transcripts to find patterns and uncover the true intent behind customer questions. This feedback loop provides deep insights that can be used to refine sales scripts, marketing messages, and the primary agent's programming.

The team moves beyond surface-level KPIs like open and click rates. They measure success by its contribution to broader business objectives: generating more value with less cost and investment. This focus on operational efficiency ensures marketing activities are directly tied to tangible financial outcomes and long-term customer value.

Replace Vanity Metrics with Conversational Quality to Measure AI Performance | RiffOn