Leaders in investment organizations are often promoted for their exceptional technical skills—analysis, presentations—not for their management abilities. This creates a leadership deficit that requires deliberate focus and coaching to overcome.

The transition to managing managers requires a fundamental identity shift from individual contributor to enabler. A leader's value is no longer in their personal output. They must ask, "Is it more important that I do the work, or that the work gets done?" This question forces a necessary focus on delegation, empowerment, and system-building.

Individual contributors are rewarded for having answers and sharing their expertise. To succeed as a leader, one must fundamentally change their approach. The job becomes about empowering others by asking insightful questions and actively listening, a diametrically opposed skillset that is difficult to adopt.

Don't conflate confidence with self-assurance, which is the *accurate* assessment of one's skills. Many top performers downplay their expertise out of a false sense of humility. This incongruence can be misinterpreted by others as manipulation, confusion, or a risky inability to self-assess.

Traits like extreme responsiveness, which earn praise early in a career, can lead to burnout and poor prioritization at senior levels. Leaders must recognize when a once-beneficial belief no longer serves their new, scaled responsibilities and becomes a limiting factor.

The pace of change in AI means even senior leaders must adopt a learner's mindset. Humility is teachability, and teachability is survivability. Successful leaders are willing to learn from junior colleagues, take basic courses, and admit they don't know everything, which is crucial when there is no established blueprint.

A founder's role is constantly changing—from individual contributor to manager to culture builder. Success requires being self-aware enough to recognize you're always in a new, unfamiliar role you're not yet good at. Sticking to the old job you mastered is a primary cause of failure to scale.

Many leaders, particularly in technical fields, mistakenly believe their role is to provide all the answers. This approach disempowers teams and creates a bottleneck. Shifting from advising to coaching unlocks a team's problem-solving potential and allows leaders to scale their impact.

When leadership is seen as a duty to serve rather than a chance for personal gain, the weight of responsibility can suppress feelings of self-doubt. This selfless framing fosters a healthier, more resilient leadership style, particularly for reluctant leaders.