We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Dave Gerhardt admitted his initial negative reaction to critical feedback wasn't about disagreeing with it. It was because he knew the feedback was right and would require immense, uncomfortable effort to implement, which he wanted to avoid.
A colleague offering honest, difficult feedback should be seen as an act of profound gratitude. It demonstrates a deep investment in your personal and professional growth, and having the courage to offer such 'coaching up' is a pivotal, though uncomfortable, opportunity for development.
Avoiding difficult conversations to be "nice" is counterproductive. This lack of candor creates anxiety, as employees don't know where they stand. Delivering direct feedback with kindness and a genuine intent to help allows people to improve without fostering a culture of fear.
Resistance is critical information, not just a barrier. It often reveals a team's fear of losing something valuable, such as autonomy, their established identity, or a sense of expertise. Understanding what they're protecting is key to making change less threatening.
When processing feedback, pay special attention to the comments that are most upsetting. An intense emotional reaction of hurt or anger often indicates the criticism is correct and has struck a real area of weakness or a "soft tissue" that needs to be addressed.
A strong, emotional reaction to feedback is a key indicator of pre-existing self-awareness. The anger isn't about the information itself, but about being held accountable for a shortcoming you already knew existed and needed to fix.
Before trying to make a change 'feel right,' leaders must first neutralize the negative feelings it generates. Resistance stems from fear, threats to identity, or feeling controlled. Addressing these 'wrong' feelings is the prerequisite for gaining buy-in and avoiding psychological reactance.
Teams often react to negative feedback with a 'grief curve': shock, anger, and denial. Leaders should see this not as a problem, but as proof the team is invested. The goal isn't to eliminate the reaction, but to help the team move through it faster.
The most selfish thing a leader can do is withhold feedback because giving it would be uncomfortable. In that moment, you are optimizing for your own comfort at the expense of your colleague's growth. High-performance teams require radical candor, which is fundamentally an unselfish act.
Bridgewater's Co-CIO has learned to "treasure" the feeling of anger or defensiveness when receiving criticism, especially from junior colleagues. He sees this emotional reaction not as a reason to dismiss the feedback, but as a powerful signal that it's touching on a real blind spot he is subconsciously trying to ignore.
Instead of trying to find the perfect words, preface difficult feedback by stating your own nervousness. Saying, "I'm nervous to share this because I value our relationship," humanizes the interaction, disarms defensiveness, and makes the other person more receptive to the message.