Teams often react to negative feedback with a 'grief curve': shock, anger, and denial. Leaders should see this not as a problem, but as proof the team is invested. The goal isn't to eliminate the reaction, but to help the team move through it faster.
Related Insights
People won't bring you problems if they fear your reaction. To build trust, leaders must not only control their emotions but actively thank the messenger. This reframes problem-reporting from a negative event to a positive act that helps you see reality more clearly.
The best way to receive constructive feedback is to simply listen. Resist the engineering impulse to immediately "debug" the situation by asking questions, which can make the giver feel they must justify their feedback. Absorb it first, then reflect and follow up later.
The most selfish thing a leader can do is withhold feedback because giving it would be uncomfortable. In that moment, you are optimizing for your own comfort at the expense of your colleague's growth. High-performance teams require radical candor, which is fundamentally an unselfish act.
Refusing to discuss fear and feelings at work is inefficient. Leaders must invest a reasonable amount of time proactively attending to team emotions or be forced to squander an unreasonable amount of time reacting to the negative behaviors that result from those unaddressed feelings.
A common pitfall for new managers is seeking validation by being liked. A great leader's role is to provide constructive challenges and uncomfortable feedback, which fosters genuine growth and ultimately earns the team's gratitude and respect.
Bridgewater's Co-CIO has learned to "treasure" the feeling of anger or defensiveness when receiving criticism, especially from junior colleagues. He sees this emotional reaction not as a reason to dismiss the feedback, but as a powerful signal that it's touching on a real blind spot he is subconsciously trying to ignore.
To prevent defensiveness when giving critical feedback, managers should explicitly state their positive intent. Saying "I'm giving this because I care about you and your career" shifts the focus from a personal attack to a supportive act of leadership aimed at helping them grow.
The real leadership challenge isn't feeling negative emotions, but the "inflation" of those feelings into disproportionate reactions. This is caused by misinterpretations, taking things personally, or past trauma. The goal is to manage the intensity of the reaction, not the feeling itself.
The team conducts immediate "hot debriefs" for quick learning within a thick-skinned culture focused on improvement, not blame. "Cold debriefs" happen later, allowing emotions to cool for more strategic conversations after a high-pressure event.
Most employees avoid giving leaders negative feedback for fear of repercussions. However, a leader's ability to improve is directly tied to their willingness to accept the 'emotional hit' of criticism. The team member who provides unvarnished truth is therefore the most critical for achieving long-term goals.
