Employees resent uncertainty more than they resist change. When leaders withhold communication because they lack perfect answers, it creates a vacuum filled with fear and friction. Proactive, even incomplete, communication is better than silence, which employees often interpret as a sign of major problems.
Related Insights
Don't sell change as a seamless process. Like a surgeon detailing post-op recovery, leaders must be transparent about the chaotic and painful phase of transition. This manages expectations, builds trust, and helps people endure the 'psychological soreness' of transformation.
In a dysfunctional environment, the absence of pushback is a significant warning sign. Humans are highly adaptive; those who can't tolerate the system leave, while those who remain learn to cope. This creates a dangerous silence, where leaders mistakenly believe everything is fine because no one is complaining.
A leader's desire to be liked can lead to a lack of candor, which is ultimately cruel. Avoiding difficult feedback allows underperformance to fester and makes an eventual firing a shocking surprise. This damages trust more than direct, consistent, and tough conversations would have.
When giving challenging news, leaders cannot just "drop the bombshell and walk out." A successful approach requires three steps: 1) be clear and direct with the news, 2) provide the context and rationale behind it, and 3) stay to connect with the team, showing commitment and outlining next steps.
Refusing to discuss fear and feelings at work is inefficient. Leaders must invest a reasonable amount of time proactively attending to team emotions or be forced to squander an unreasonable amount of time reacting to the negative behaviors that result from those unaddressed feelings.
Even with a solid plan, failing to communicate it *before* execution makes you seem reactive. Leaders perceive strategy through proactive announcements. Stating what you are going to do frames your actions as deliberate, while explaining them only when asked sounds defensive and tactical.
Executives often avoid acknowledging a team's technical skill gaps, believing it damages morale. In reality, this sets the team up for failure by forcing them to say 'yes' to impossible tasks. Openly identifying gaps allows for a realistic plan to train, hire, or partner.
Leaders often avoid sharing negative news to "not scare the children." However, this creates an information vacuum that teams will fill with the "darkest ideas available" from other sources. Leaders must compete with misinformation by providing clear, honest context, even when it's difficult.
When strategic direction is unclear due to leadership changes, waiting for clarity leads to stagnation. The better approach is to create a draft plan with the explicit understanding it may be discarded. This provides a starting point for new leadership and maintains team momentum, so long as you are psychologically prepared to pivot.
Complete transparency can create panic and demotivation. A leader's role is to filter harsh realities, like potential layoffs, and deliver an authentic message that is both realistic and optimistic enough for the team to absorb productively, rather than sharing every fear.