We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Salespeople mistakenly follow the five generic stages in their CRM (Intro, Demo, etc.) as their sales process. In reality, a successful enterprise motion has closer to 15 discrete steps. The CRM stages are merely high-level buckets for weighting forecasts, not a playbook for closing deals.
Typical sales stages like "Demo" or "Proposal" are seller-centric. A more effective process uses buyer-centric stages like "Problem Agreement" or "Value Agreement." This focuses the sales motion on what decisions the buyer needs to make to move forward confidently.
Forecasting accuracy fails when based on a seller's checklist of actions like "proposal sent." Instead, define sales stages by concrete buyer actions, like the number of stakeholders involved or if they've reviewed a proposal. This provides a more realistic view of a deal's health.
A common mistake is basing sales stages on seller actions like "Demo Held." A more effective process uses verifiable buyer commitments as exit criteria, such as achieving "Problem Agreement" from the champion. This accurately reflects the buyer's journey, not just your to-do list.
Mark Casaglo advises against process stages like "discovery call" or "demo call," which are seller-centric. Instead, structure the process around securing five key buyer agreements: problem agreement, solution agreement, power agreement, commercial agreement, and vendor approval. This reframes selling around buyer commitment rather than seller activity.
Activities like demos or discovery calls are not rigid stages but versatile tools to be deployed at any point in the sales cycle. A demo can be used to establish problem agreement, while discovery can be used to confirm value later in the deal. Decoupling tools from stages gives reps the flexibility to mature the buyer's decision-making as needed.
A robust sales process progresses through five distinct stages of buyer commitment: Problem Agreement, Solution Agreement, Power Problem & Solution Agreement, Commercial Agreement, and finally Vendor Review. Each stage is defined by what the buyer agrees to, not what the seller does.
Traditional CRM stages reflect seller activities (e.g., demoed, proposal sent). The ADVANCED framework (Acknowledge problem, Documented issue, Validated by team, etc.) tracks the buyer's journey and commitment level. This provides a more accurate assessment of a deal's true progress and likelihood to close.
Shift from a process defined by meetings (Discovery, Demo) to one defined by milestones (Problem Agreement, Priority Agreement). This prevents artificially slowing down high-velocity deals or rushing complex ones, as the number of meetings required to reach each agreement can vary.
Structure sales stages around key psychological hurdles a buyer must clear: fear of wrong choice (Problem Agreement), inertia (Priority Agreement), loss of autonomy (Evaluation Agreement), justification anxiety (Value Agreement), and consensus paralysis (Commercial Agreement). This aligns the sales process with the buyer's emotional journey, increasing deal momentum.
Deal stages named after seller activities (e.g., Discovery, Demo) are flawed because they don't measure the buyer's progress in their decision-making journey. This leads to reps executing tasks without actually advancing the deal, as the buyer may not be psychologically ready to move forward.