Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

A common mistake is basing sales stages on seller actions like "Demo Held." A more effective process uses verifiable buyer commitments as exit criteria, such as achieving "Problem Agreement" from the champion. This accurately reflects the buyer's journey, not just your to-do list.

Related Insights

Typical sales stages like "Demo" or "Proposal" are seller-centric. A more effective process uses buyer-centric stages like "Problem Agreement" or "Value Agreement." This focuses the sales motion on what decisions the buyer needs to make to move forward confidently.

Forecasting accuracy fails when based on a seller's checklist of actions like "proposal sent." Instead, define sales stages by concrete buyer actions, like the number of stakeholders involved or if they've reviewed a proposal. This provides a more realistic view of a deal's health.

A critical insight from Refine Labs is that what marketers call a "funnel" isn't a map of customer behavior, but a framework for an internal sales process. This common misinterpretation leads marketing teams to incorrectly believe they are modeling the buyer's journey when they are merely tracking their own operational stages.

Mark Casaglo advises against process stages like "discovery call" or "demo call," which are seller-centric. Instead, structure the process around securing five key buyer agreements: problem agreement, solution agreement, power agreement, commercial agreement, and vendor approval. This reframes selling around buyer commitment rather than seller activity.

A robust sales process progresses through five distinct stages of buyer commitment: Problem Agreement, Solution Agreement, Power Problem & Solution Agreement, Commercial Agreement, and finally Vendor Review. Each stage is defined by what the buyer agrees to, not what the seller does.

Traditional CRM stages reflect seller activities (e.g., demoed, proposal sent). The ADVANCED framework (Acknowledge problem, Documented issue, Validated by team, etc.) tracks the buyer's journey and commitment level. This provides a more accurate assessment of a deal's true progress and likelihood to close.

Shift from a process defined by meetings (Discovery, Demo) to one defined by milestones (Problem Agreement, Priority Agreement). This prevents artificially slowing down high-velocity deals or rushing complex ones, as the number of meetings required to reach each agreement can vary.

Frame your sales stages around the decisions you need from a prospect (a 'get'), not the tasks you must complete (a 'do'). For example, the goal isn't 'do a demo,' it's 'get agreement that you're the vendor of choice.' This encourages creativity and efficiency, preventing unnecessary activities.

A common closing failure occurs when a seller moves to the proposal stage while the buyer is still unconvinced the solution addresses their specific problem. Sellers must explicitly confirm the buyer agrees the solution solves their pain before asking for the sale to avoid this critical disconnect.

Don't measure deal progress by the number of meetings held. Instead, define specific exit criteria for each sales stage. A deal only moves forward when the prospect meets these criteria, which can happen with or without a live meeting. This reframes velocity around outcomes, not activities.