Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Deal stages named after seller activities (e.g., Discovery, Demo) are flawed because they don't measure the buyer's progress in their decision-making journey. This leads to reps executing tasks without actually advancing the deal, as the buyer may not be psychologically ready to move forward.

Related Insights

Typical sales stages like "Demo" or "Proposal" are seller-centric. A more effective process uses buyer-centric stages like "Problem Agreement" or "Value Agreement." This focuses the sales motion on what decisions the buyer needs to make to move forward confidently.

Forecasting accuracy fails when based on a seller's checklist of actions like "proposal sent." Instead, define sales stages by concrete buyer actions, like the number of stakeholders involved or if they've reviewed a proposal. This provides a more realistic view of a deal's health.

A critical insight from Refine Labs is that what marketers call a "funnel" isn't a map of customer behavior, but a framework for an internal sales process. This common misinterpretation leads marketing teams to incorrectly believe they are modeling the buyer's journey when they are merely tracking their own operational stages.

A common mistake is basing sales stages on seller actions like "Demo Held." A more effective process uses verifiable buyer commitments as exit criteria, such as achieving "Problem Agreement" from the champion. This accurately reflects the buyer's journey, not just your to-do list.

Most AEs get stuck at 'Level 2,' where discovery is a stage focused on understanding the problem. Elite 'Level 3' sellers see discovery as a continuous process used throughout the entire deal cycle to build the business case, drive consensus, and facilitate the buying journey.

Activities like demos or discovery calls are not rigid stages but versatile tools to be deployed at any point in the sales cycle. A demo can be used to establish problem agreement, while discovery can be used to confirm value later in the deal. Decoupling tools from stages gives reps the flexibility to mature the buyer's decision-making as needed.

Traditional CRM stages reflect seller activities (e.g., demoed, proposal sent). The ADVANCED framework (Acknowledge problem, Documented issue, Validated by team, etc.) tracks the buyer's journey and commitment level. This provides a more accurate assessment of a deal's true progress and likelihood to close.

Shift from a process defined by meetings (Discovery, Demo) to one defined by milestones (Problem Agreement, Priority Agreement). This prevents artificially slowing down high-velocity deals or rushing complex ones, as the number of meetings required to reach each agreement can vary.

Structure sales stages around key psychological hurdles a buyer must clear: fear of wrong choice (Problem Agreement), inertia (Priority Agreement), loss of autonomy (Evaluation Agreement), justification anxiety (Value Agreement), and consensus paralysis (Commercial Agreement). This aligns the sales process with the buyer's emotional journey, increasing deal momentum.

Deals are lost when salespeople fail to spend enough time in discovery to understand the customer's true need. They must identify the 'moment of demand'—when the customer both recognizes their problem and is ready to decide—rather than rushing to the close with the wrong solution.

Traditional Sales Stages Like "Discovery" Track Seller Actions, Not Buyer Maturity | RiffOn