Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Structure sales stages around key psychological hurdles a buyer must clear: fear of wrong choice (Problem Agreement), inertia (Priority Agreement), loss of autonomy (Evaluation Agreement), justification anxiety (Value Agreement), and consensus paralysis (Commercial Agreement). This aligns the sales process with the buyer's emotional journey, increasing deal momentum.

Related Insights

Typical sales stages like "Demo" or "Proposal" are seller-centric. A more effective process uses buyer-centric stages like "Problem Agreement" or "Value Agreement." This focuses the sales motion on what decisions the buyer needs to make to move forward confidently.

View buyer resistance not as an emotional barrier, but as a physics problem. The goal is to reduce 'mental friction' or 'cognitive loading' for the buyer. By systematically lowering their anxiety and making the decision process easier, you increase the likelihood of a 'yes'.

A common mistake is basing sales stages on seller actions like "Demo Held." A more effective process uses verifiable buyer commitments as exit criteria, such as achieving "Problem Agreement" from the champion. This accurately reflects the buyer's journey, not just your to-do list.

Mark Casaglo advises against process stages like "discovery call" or "demo call," which are seller-centric. Instead, structure the process around securing five key buyer agreements: problem agreement, solution agreement, power agreement, commercial agreement, and vendor approval. This reframes selling around buyer commitment rather than seller activity.

A robust sales process progresses through five distinct stages of buyer commitment: Problem Agreement, Solution Agreement, Power Problem & Solution Agreement, Commercial Agreement, and finally Vendor Review. Each stage is defined by what the buyer agrees to, not what the seller does.

Many buyers are purchasing a specific solution for the first time. Sellers must act as consultants, providing a clear buying process map (a mutual action plan) to guide their champion and accelerate the deal, preventing stalls caused by uncertainty.

Shift from a process defined by meetings (Discovery, Demo) to one defined by milestones (Problem Agreement, Priority Agreement). This prevents artificially slowing down high-velocity deals or rushing complex ones, as the number of meetings required to reach each agreement can vary.

Buyers aren't just buying a product; they're buying a process and an outcome. Counteract decision paralysis by clearly mapping out the step-by-step journey *after* the contract is signed, including onboarding and training. This reduces the buyer's emotional risk and makes the decision easier.

Don't assume your buying process is easy for the customer. What's simple for you is a new, complex situation for them. Salespeople lose deals by creating friction. To win, you must identify these "barriers of engagement" and do the work for the customer to make purchasing as simple as possible.

Deal stages named after seller activities (e.g., Discovery, Demo) are flawed because they don't measure the buyer's progress in their decision-making journey. This leads to reps executing tasks without actually advancing the deal, as the buyer may not be psychologically ready to move forward.

Map Your Sales Process to Overcoming Core Buyer Psychological Barriers | RiffOn