The goal for a majority-EV fleet is not viable with current technology. The material requirements for batteries and components are so vast that a US-only transition would consume every scrap of lithium, copper, graphite, and other key minerals produced globally, leaving none for any other country or industry.

The most significant long-term threat to the supply of critical materials isn't a lack of resources in the ground, but a lack of people. The aging workforce of geologists and mining engineers, with a shrinking pipeline of new talent, poses a greater systemic risk to the industry.

The administration's explicit focus on re-shoring manufacturing and preparing for potential geopolitical conflict provides a clear investment playbook. Capital should flow towards commodities and companies critical to the military-industrial complex, such as producers of copper, steel, and rare earth metals.

While the US exports less to Canada by volume, its exports (electronics, pharma) have far higher margins and shareholder value multiples than Canadian exports (lumber, oil). Therefore, for every dollar of trade disrupted by tariffs, the US loses significantly more economic value, making the policy self-defeating.

An acute supply squeeze in copper is imminent as massive U.S. imports create a severe inventory dislocation. With LME stocks dwindling to critical levels, J.P. Morgan predicts prices must spike to reverse the arbitrage and incentivize the flow of metal out of the U.S. to where it's more needed.

While headlines focus on advanced chips, China’s real leverage comes from its strategic control over less glamorous but essential upstream inputs like rare earths and magnets. It has even banned the export of magnet-making technology, creating critical, hard-to-solve bottlenecks for Western manufacturing.

China is restricting exports of essential rare earth minerals and EV battery manufacturing equipment. This is a strategic move to protect its global dominance in these critical industries, leveraging the fact that other countries have outsourced environmentally harmful mining to them for decades.

For 50 years, commodity prices moved together, driven by synchronized global demand. J.P. Morgan identifies a breakdown of this trend since 2024, dubbing it the 'crocodile cycle,' where supply-side factors cause metals to outperform while energy underperforms, creating a widening gap like a crocodile's mouth.

While media outlets create hype cycles around certain critical materials like rare earths, other equally vital commodities such as tungsten and tin face similar geopolitical supply risks but receive far less attention. These 'un-hyped' bottlenecks present significant investment opportunities for diligent researchers.