Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

To get someone to agree to an undesirable outcome (like jail), a former Secret Service agent uses a five-step process: 1) Blame outside forces, 2) Understand their predicament, 3) Diminish the impact (not culpability), 4) Demonstrate tactical empathy with a story, and 5) Focus on their noble "why."

Related Insights

The most potent persuasion doesn't rely on nuance but on triggering three ancient “super-categories.” By framing a message around immediate threat (Fight/Flight), group identity (Us/Them), and moral clarity (Right/Wrong), skilled communicators can bypass rational thought and elicit an instinctive response.

Dick Cheney justified harsh interrogation techniques not by downplaying them, but by reframing the debate as a stark moral choice. He posed a question: 'Are you going to ransom lives for your honor? Or are you going to do your job?' This rhetoric positioned torture as a necessary, albeit unpleasant, duty to prevent future attacks, rather than a legal or ethical violation.

To genuinely change minds, avoid demonizing the opposition. First, present your case calmly and plainly. Second, support it with hard evidence (“show the receipts”). Third, build trust and an emotional connection by demonstrating that you are arguing honorably, not just rooting for your own 'team'.

The key to building deep connection isn't getting someone to say 'you're right,' but 'that's right.' The latter confirms they feel fully seen and heard, creating a neurobiological connection essential for trust, a technique applicable from hostage situations to management.

Tasked with gathering user feedback in a mall for a job interview, the speaker failed with a product-centric pitch. He succeeded by reframing the request as a personal, empathetic plea: "I'm on a job interview... Would you do that just so I can get this job?" This leveraged social goodwill over transactional value.

Humans have a "Reason Respecting Tendency" so powerful that our brains respond to the structure of a reason, not just its substance. Experiments show that saying "I have to make some copies" is an effective way to cut a line, even though it's a tautology. The word "because" triggers automatic compliance.

People are more effective at deceiving others about their true motivations when they first deceive themselves. Genuinely believing your own pro-social justification for a self-interested act makes the act more compelling and convincing to others.

Instead of overwhelming people with logical reasons to change, persuade them by helping them envision a new version of themselves. Use stories and framing like "Imagine what it would be like if..." to invite them to try on the identity associated with the desired action.

Use a four-step framework for high-stakes talks: define your Purpose (your mission), Listen actively, Ask clarifying questions instead of assuming, and determine the Next steps for resolution. This structure keeps you anchored and prevents emotional derailment.

Instead of judging a person's negative behavior, seek to understand their story. Actions are often rooted in past trauma or learned patterns. Understanding the "why" behind the behavior, as explored in Dr. Bruce Perry's book "What Happened to You?", is key to leading with empathy.