Intern calibration meetings are often the most emotional because managers become deeply invested in their single intern. They tie their own performance to the intern's success, leading to a room full of managers arguing that their intern "exceeds expectations," creating high-stakes, tense discussions.
Related Insights
To change unwritten, bureaucratic rules, such as those in performance calibrations, avoid confronting decision-makers in a group setting where they become defensive. The speaker advises having private 1-on-1 conversations beforehand to understand the rule's origin and present your case with evidence.
Teams often react to negative feedback with a 'grief curve': shock, anger, and denial. Leaders should see this not as a problem, but as proof the team is invested. The goal isn't to eliminate the reaction, but to help the team move through it faster.
A leader's emotional state isn't just observed; it's physically mirrored by their team's brains. This neurological "energy transference" sets the tone for the entire group, meaning a leader's unmanaged stress can directly infect team dynamics and performance.
Do not use family, spouses, or even your direct manager for accountability. They have too much at stake emotionally or professionally to be objective. The best partners are detached, allowing them to hold your feet to the fire and be firm without worrying about damaging the relationship.
At Founders Fund, intense, even loud, disagreements during investment committees are not a sign of a toxic culture, but rather one of deep psychological safety. The partners have such secure relationships that they can engage in "no holds barred, complete truth-seeking" without fear of political repercussions, similar to arguing with a sibling.
Refusing to discuss fear and feelings at work is inefficient. Leaders must invest a reasonable amount of time proactively attending to team emotions or be forced to squander an unreasonable amount of time reacting to the negative behaviors that result from those unaddressed feelings.
When a manager's evaluation and an employee's self-assessment differ, treat it as a valuable signal. This gap is not a conflict to resolve but a conversation starter to clarify expectations, uncover blind spots, and align on performance standards before formal reviews.
When a maker's performance drops, managers often increase check-in meetings to 'help'. These interruptions further fragment the maker's time, causing performance to drop even more. This creates a productivity death spiral where the manager's intended solution becomes the root cause of the problem.
To ensure continuous alignment, the speaker measured a "surprise factor." Before a review, he and his report would each write down the expected outcome. A mismatch was a failure of his management and communication during the performance cycle. Even positive surprises indicate a coaching failure.
The real leadership challenge isn't feeling negative emotions, but the "inflation" of those feelings into disproportionate reactions. This is caused by misinterpretations, taking things personally, or past trauma. The goal is to manage the intensity of the reaction, not the feeling itself.
