Focusing solely on making communication faster or shorter is a mistake. Communication ultimately fails if the recipient doesn't interpret the message as the sender intended. The true goal is creating shared understanding, which accounts for the recipient's personal context and perspective, not just transmitting data efficiently.
Related Insights
Many conversations fail because we don't truly listen. Instead, we just pause to formulate our next attack. This isn't listening; it's strategizing. This defensive approach erodes connection and understanding, costing us relationships and opportunities because it's hard to hate someone you truly understand.
The obsession with removing friction is often wrong. When users have low intent or understanding, the goal isn't to speed them up but to build their comprehension of your product's value. If software asks you to make a decision you don't understand, it makes you feel stupid, which is the ultimate failure.
The foundation of clear communication isn't eloquence but active listening. The goal is to understand the other person's perspective before formulating a response, which also helps prevent reactive, stress-induced replies and makes others feel heard.
People engage in three types of conversations: practical (problem-solving), emotional (empathy), or social (identity). When participants are in different modes—like one offering solutions when the other wants validation—the connection fails. Recognizing and aligning these modes is key to effective communication.
When people don't understand your point, it's often a sign that you are not meeting them where they are. Instead of pushing forward impatiently, you must go back to their starting point, re-establish shared assumptions, or reframe the message from their perspective.
When a big-picture leader communicates with a detail-oriented team, friction is inevitable. Recognizing this as a clash of communication styles—not a personal failing or lack of competence—is the first step. Adaptation, rather than frustration, becomes the solution.
Bad writing often happens because experts find it impossible to imagine what it's like *not* to know something. This "curse" leads them to assume their private knowledge is common knowledge, causing them to omit jargon explanations, abbreviations, and concrete examples. The key to clarity is empathy for the reader's perspective.
Gaining genuine team alignment is more complex than getting a superficial agreement. It involves actively surfacing unspoken assumptions and hidden contexts to ensure that when the team agrees, they are all agreeing to the same, fully understood plan.
The idea of 'perfect' communication is a myth. Everyday talk is messy, and what one person considers 'good' communication, another may not. Acknowledging this subjectivity frees you to connect more authentically instead of striving for an impossible, universal standard of being 'just right.'
We often assume our message is received as intended, but this is a frequent point of failure in communication. The only thing that matters is what the listener understands. To ensure clarity and avoid conflict, proactively ask the other person to reflect back what they heard you say.