We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
When asked to define a problem, most people state its opposite (e.g., saying 'money' when the problem is 'lack of money'). This fundamental error prevents a clear problem statement. Training teams to articulate the actual deficit is the first step toward an effective solution.
Prospects often describe wants (e.g., "a more efficient system"), which are not true problems. Asking about the motivation behind their desire forces them to articulate the underlying pain that actually drives a purchase decision.
Executive teams can argue endlessly when they use the same words but have different underlying definitions. A simple intervention—pausing to have each person define a key term—can reveal they aren't even talking about the same problem, immediately resolving the conflict.
Users aren't product designers; they can only identify problems and create workarounds with the tools they have. Their feature requests represent these workarounds, not the optimal solution. A researcher's job is to uncover the deeper, underlying problem.
Clients often describe their issues using sterile metrics (e.g., a 20% close rate). This is just 'intellectual reporting.' A top salesperson must dig deeper to uncover the tangible pain, the personal or organizational 'hurt,' and the economic consequences that these surface-level symptoms create.
Customers request specific features (supply), but this masks the true demand—the underlying problem they're trying to solve. Focusing on the 'why' behind the request leads to simpler, more effective solutions, like building a digest email instead of a complex 'advanced settings' page.
The common advice to ask 'why' five times can reinforce an incorrect initial framing of a problem, leading you to optimize the wrong thing. A more powerful approach is to first question the frame itself by asking, 'Is this the right thing to focus on?' before diving into causes.
Directly asking customers for solutions yields generic answers your competitors also hear. The goal is to uncover their underlying problems, which is your job to solve, not theirs to articulate. This approach leads to unique insights and avoids creating 'me-too' products.
Saying "the market is crowded" or "there are no good salespeople" renders you powerless. By reframing these as "I lack the skill to get more leads" or "I lack the skill to hire well," you become the source of the solution and regain agency to change the outcome.
A salesperson may focus on tactical issues like a poor CRM, but the root cause of their challenges is often a more fundamental business problem, such as production capacity. Solving the perceived problem (getting a better CRM) could be useless and even exacerbate the real issue by overwhelming the production line.
Instead of focusing on tactical issues, ask potential customers what they would wish for if they had a magic wand. This prompts them to describe their ideal, transformative solution, revealing the deeper, more valuable problem you should be solving.