Customers request specific features (supply), but this masks the true demand—the underlying problem they're trying to solve. Focusing on the 'why' behind the request leads to simpler, more effective solutions, like building a digest email instead of a complex 'advanced settings' page.
Founders often dread sales because they mistakenly believe their role is to aggressively convince customers. This "seller push" feels inauthentic. Adopting a "buyer pull" perspective, where you help customers solve existing problems, transforms sales from a chore into a collaborative process.
If prospects seem engaged and agree to follow-ups but then disappear, it's a strong indicator you're "pushing" a solution they don't truly need. In their mind, they don't understand how your product solves their prioritized problem, even if they were polite during the call.
The fundamental force in a sale isn't a seller's persuasion. It's the buyer's pre-existing need to accomplish a task on their mental "to-do list." When your product (supply) fits that task better than alternatives, the buyer pulls it from you, requiring minimal convincing.
A competitor may have a "better" product on paper, but buyers' demand is nuanced. A founder can win a deal against a well-funded rival by discovering the buyer's primary need is industry expertise, not more features. By aligning with this deeper "pull," the competitor's strengths become irrelevant.
Believing you must *convince* the market leads to a dangerous product strategy: building a feature-rich platform to persuade buyers. This delays sales, burns capital, and prevents learning. A "buyer pull" approach focuses on building the minimum product needed to solve one pre-existing problem.
A common sales mistake is showcasing a product's full capabilities. This "push" approach often overwhelms and confuses buyers. In a "pull" model, the demo should be surgically focused, showing only the clicks required to solve the specific, pre-identified problem on the buyer's "to-do list."