The 'Donroe Doctrine' is not a contradiction of an 'America First' platform but its logical extension. The administration's view is that the US cannot be the preeminent global power without first being the preeminent regional power. Consolidating influence in the Western Hemisphere is seen as a necessary foundation for projecting power globally.
Related Insights
Under Trump, the primary tool for projecting U.S. power is shifting from economic instruments like tariffs to direct military, intelligence, and cyber capabilities. This "Donroe Doctrine" leverages America's asymmetrical advantages in these areas, especially in its hemisphere, to achieve foreign policy wins without relying on economic coercion.
Unlike predecessors who framed foreign policy within a broader worldview (e.g., democracy promotion), Trump's approach is purely transactional and theatrical. It lacks a moral or ideological justification, instead focusing on demanding tribute, like oil from Venezuela, to appeal to a nationalist base without building a durable governing coalition.
Trump’s national security strategy subtly resurrected the 'Roosevelt Corollary' of 1904. This doctrine extends the Monroe Doctrine by asserting the U.S. right to proactively change governments it dislikes in the Western Hemisphere, signaling a return to a more interventionist and sphere-of-influence-based foreign policy.
Despite the public focus on oil, the primary goal of removing Maduro was likely to demonstrate U.S. primacy in the Western Hemisphere. The action serves as a strong signal that the U.S. is willing to act aggressively to enforce its influence in the region.
The US invasion of Venezuela isn't for oil or to stop drugs, but to counter China's strategic influence via its Belt and Road Initiative. This reasserts the Monroe Doctrine—preventing rival footholds in its hemisphere—in a new Cold War context.
The long-standing Monroe Doctrine is being superseded by a "Trump Doctrine." This new worldview prioritizes hemispheric dominance, unilateralism, and proactive intervention for specific economic and security interests (e.g., controlling immigration, securing vital assets), fundamentally changing how America views its sphere of influence.
The US's global power is eroding due to debt and inflation. Trump's aggressive foreign policy is not random; it's a high-risk strategy to press America's current advantage and re-establish dominance before rivals like China can take over. The only alternative is accepting a managed decline.
Marco Rubio articulated Trump's foreign policy as a 'spheres of influence' model, a modern Monroe Doctrine. This framework cedes global leadership, envisioning a world where the U.S. controls the West, Russia controls its territory and Europe, and China controls Asia. This marks a fundamental shift from America's post-WWII role as a global superpower to a regional one.
The administration's approach is not simple isolationism. While demanding a dominant sphere of influence in the Western Hemisphere, Trump also maintains the desire for unhindered freedom of action globally, such as mediating conflicts far from US shores. This creates a hybrid policy of 'dominance at home and freedom to roam abroad.'
Contrary to the isolationist interpretation, "America First" under Trump is a doctrine of pragmatic, and often aggressive, foreign intervention. It justifies actions like controlling another country's resources if they are deemed critical to American national security or economic stability.
