The administration's approach is not simple isolationism. While demanding a dominant sphere of influence in the Western Hemisphere, Trump also maintains the desire for unhindered freedom of action globally, such as mediating conflicts far from US shores. This creates a hybrid policy of 'dominance at home and freedom to roam abroad.'
Related Insights
Under Trump, the primary tool for projecting U.S. power is shifting from economic instruments like tariffs to direct military, intelligence, and cyber capabilities. This "Donroe Doctrine" leverages America's asymmetrical advantages in these areas, especially in its hemisphere, to achieve foreign policy wins without relying on economic coercion.
Trump’s national security strategy subtly resurrected the 'Roosevelt Corollary' of 1904. This doctrine extends the Monroe Doctrine by asserting the U.S. right to proactively change governments it dislikes in the Western Hemisphere, signaling a return to a more interventionist and sphere-of-influence-based foreign policy.
Despite the public focus on oil, the primary goal of removing Maduro was likely to demonstrate U.S. primacy in the Western Hemisphere. The action serves as a strong signal that the U.S. is willing to act aggressively to enforce its influence in the region.
The 'Donroe Doctrine' is not a contradiction of an 'America First' platform but its logical extension. The administration's view is that the US cannot be the preeminent global power without first being the preeminent regional power. Consolidating influence in the Western Hemisphere is seen as a necessary foundation for projecting power globally.
Unlike past administrations that used pretexts like 'democracy,' the Trump administration openly states its transactional goals, such as seizing oil. This 'criming in plain sight' approach is merely an overt version of historical covert US actions in regions like Latin America.
The long-standing Monroe Doctrine is being superseded by a "Trump Doctrine." This new worldview prioritizes hemispheric dominance, unilateralism, and proactive intervention for specific economic and security interests (e.g., controlling immigration, securing vital assets), fundamentally changing how America views its sphere of influence.
Marco Rubio articulated Trump's foreign policy as a 'spheres of influence' model, a modern Monroe Doctrine. This framework cedes global leadership, envisioning a world where the U.S. controls the West, Russia controls its territory and Europe, and China controls Asia. This marks a fundamental shift from America's post-WWII role as a global superpower to a regional one.
Despite an administration staffed by veterans weary of foreign entanglements, the U.S. has amassed its largest military force in the Caribbean since the Cuban Missile Crisis. This contradiction highlights a deep strategic incoherence, which the speaker calls a "strategic cacophony," making it difficult to formulate consistent national policy.
The US military operation in Venezuela is interpreted as a display of global military dominance aimed at China and Russia. This action suggests a strategic pivot towards becoming a global empire rather than retreating to a regional, isolationist Monroe Doctrine.
Contrary to the isolationist interpretation, "America First" under Trump is a doctrine of pragmatic, and often aggressive, foreign intervention. It justifies actions like controlling another country's resources if they are deemed critical to American national security or economic stability.
