Many adult workplace behaviors—possessiveness, needing attention, irrational upsets—mirror those of toddlers. Understanding this parallel helps leaders manage teams more effectively by addressing underlying unmet needs rather than just reacting to the behavior.

Related Insights

A book taught Shaka Senghor to see the inner child in his adversaries. This reframed their aggression not as a personal attack, but as an adult "temper tantrum" from an inability to articulate unhealed trauma. This perspective shift instantly changed his approach to resolving conflict.

Most leaders are conflict-avoidant. Instead of running from tension, view it as a data point signaling an unaddressed issue or misalignment. This reframes conflict from a threat into an opportunity for discovery and improvement, prompting curiosity rather than fear.

Before judging a person's behavior, seek to understand their story. A man's strict, black-and-white worldview was a direct result of discovering his father's secret family. Understanding this context transformed resentment of his rigidity into compassion. This practice can radically improve team dynamics.

When an employee seems defiant, it's rarely a deliberate act of insubordination. Instead, it's a signal that a request has caused an internal conflict or values mismatch. Leaders should treat this as a cue to investigate the root cause, not to punish the behavior.

View poor performance or difficult behavior as a manifestation of 'feelings overpowering skills,' rather than a conscious bad choice. This transforms a leader's role from a disciplinarian to a coach focused on teaching the missing skills to manage the situation.

Refusing to discuss fear and feelings at work is inefficient. Leaders must invest a reasonable amount of time proactively attending to team emotions or be forced to squander an unreasonable amount of time reacting to the negative behaviors that result from those unaddressed feelings.

'Hidden blockers' like micromanagement or a need to always be right rarely stem from negative intent. They are often deep-seated, counterproductive strategies to fulfill fundamental human needs for value, safety, or belonging. Identifying the underlying need is the first step toward finding a healthier way to meet it.

People are more receptive to feedback when they feel seen. By first acknowledging their perspective and reality ('connecting'), you build a bridge that makes them willing to cooperate and change their behavior, rather than becoming defensive.

Frame difficult conversations by separating the problematic behavior (e.g., being late) from the person's identity (e.g., being lazy). This 'good person who is struggling with X' approach prevents defensiveness and allows for a productive discussion about the issue.

Instead of judging a person's negative behavior, seek to understand their story. Actions are often rooted in past trauma or learned patterns. Understanding the "why" behind the behavior, as explored in Dr. Bruce Perry's book "What Happened to You?", is key to leading with empathy.