In a rapidly changing environment, adaptability ('malleability') is key. To get past rehearsed answers about work projects, ask candidates to describe personal changes they've made in their own lives. This reveals their genuine capacity for self-reflection and adaptation.
To hire for traits over background, Mark Kosaglo suggests testing for coachability directly. Run a skill-based roleplay (e.g., discovery), provide specific feedback, and then run the exact same roleplay again. The key is to see if the candidate can actually implement the coaching, not just if they are open to receiving it.
Senior leaders now value candidates who ask excellent questions and are eager to solve problems over those who act like they know everything. This represents a significant shift from valuing 'knowers' to valuing 'learners' in the workplace.
To accurately assess an unteachable trait like coachability, you can't just ask about it. You must create a situation that requires it. For coachability, run a brief role-play, provide direct feedback, and ask them to do it again, observing their verbal and non-verbal reactions to the coaching itself.
Asking candidates to describe themselves metaphorically (as a drink or spice) bypasses rehearsed answers. This forces authentic self-reflection, revealing deeper personality traits, personal history, and character far more effectively than standard interview questions.
Ditch standard FANG interview questions. Instead, ask candidates to describe a messy but valuable project they shipped. The best candidates will tell an authentic, automatic story with personal anecdotes. Their fluency and detail reveal true experience, whereas hesitation or generic answers expose a lack of depth.
Snowflake's hiring philosophy for the AI era prioritizes adaptability over specific, perishable skills. Recognizing that today's tools will be obsolete tomorrow, they screen for lifelong learners by asking questions like, 'How do you advance your craft?' rather than focusing on current tool proficiency.
Beyond IQ and EQ, interview for 'Resilience Quotient' (RQ)—the ability to persevere through setbacks. A key tactic is to ask candidates about their proudest achievement, then follow up with, 'What would you do differently?' to see how they navigated strife and learned from it.
Instead of generic interview questions, ask what truly motivates a candidate and what they'd do for a hobby if money weren't an issue. The way they describe these passions reveals their energy, personality, and core drivers far more effectively than rehearsed answers about work experience.
Rather than using personality assessments to accept or reject candidates, the firm uses the results to craft more insightful interview questions. This helps them probe for specific traits and understand role fit without making the test a pass/fail gate, acknowledging there is no single 'good' personality.
To gauge a partner manager candidate's empathy, ask for an example of a proud accomplishment. Candidates who frame success in terms of helping their partner achieve a goal, rather than just hitting their own targets, demonstrate the genuine care required for true partnership. This reveals their core motivations more effectively than direct questions.