Rather than using personality assessments to accept or reject candidates, the firm uses the results to craft more insightful interview questions. This helps them probe for specific traits and understand role fit without making the test a pass/fail gate, acknowledging there is no single 'good' personality.

Related Insights

The purpose of quirky interview questions has evolved. Beyond just assessing personality, questions about non-work achievements or hypothetical scenarios are now used to jolt candidates out of scripted answers and expose those relying on mid-interview AI prompts for assistance.

To accurately assess an unteachable trait like coachability, you can't just ask about it. You must create a situation that requires it. For coachability, run a brief role-play, provide direct feedback, and ask them to do it again, observing their verbal and non-verbal reactions to the coaching itself.

Injecting humor or pop culture references into interviews is not just for breaking the ice. It serves as a deliberate test for 'culture fit' by gauging a candidate's sense of humor, which strongly correlates with desirable traits like flexibility, curiosity, and friendliness that are difficult to assess directly.

Asking candidates to describe themselves metaphorically (as a drink or spice) bypasses rehearsed answers. This forces authentic self-reflection, revealing deeper personality traits, personal history, and character far more effectively than standard interview questions.

To ensure hiring assessments are effective, Council Capital analyzed hundreds of past hires. They correlated assessment scores with on-the-job success, proving a statistical link for their context and justifying the tool's use as a predictive, though not perfect, data point in their process.

Ineffective interviews try to catch candidates failing. A better approach models a collaborative rally: see how they handle challenging questions and if they can return the ball effectively. The goal is to simulate real-world problem-solving, not just grill them under pressure.

The chaotic, underdog nature of a startup is a binary filter. Frame this reality honestly during interviews. The right candidate will be energized by the challenge, while the wrong fit will be stressed. This question quickly reveals cultural suitability.

Upload interview transcripts and a job description into an AI tool. Program it to define the top criteria for the role and rate each candidate's transcript against them. This provides an objective analysis that counteracts personal affinity bias and reveals details missed during the live conversation.

Beyond IQ and EQ, interview for 'Resilience Quotient' (RQ)—the ability to persevere through setbacks. A key tactic is to ask candidates about their proudest achievement, then follow up with, 'What would you do differently?' to see how they navigated strife and learned from it.

Instead of generic interview questions, ask what truly motivates a candidate and what they'd do for a hobby if money weren't an issue. The way they describe these passions reveals their energy, personality, and core drivers far more effectively than rehearsed answers about work experience.