Trump's actions are guided by a political balancing act. Research shows negative media mentions spike when gasoline exceeds $3.50/gallon. Conversely, crude below $50-$60/barrel hurts his producer base. This creates a "parabola of political price pressure," incentivizing him to keep prices within a politically safe band.
Related Insights
The oil industry's boom-bust cycle is self-perpetuating. Low prices cause companies to slash investment and lead to a talent drain as workers leave the volatile sector. This underinvestment, combined with natural production declines, inevitably leads to tighter markets and price spikes years later.
Despite new US sanctions on Russian oil producers, Goldman Sachs remains bearish, forecasting a decline. They argue that spare capacity from OPEC, exemptions for buyers, and the reorganization of trade networks will mitigate any supply disruption, preventing a sustained price spike and leading to lower prices by 2026.
Despite healthy global oil demand, J.P. Morgan maintains a bearish outlook because supply is forecast to expand at three times the rate of demand. This oversupply creates such a large market imbalance that prices must fall to enforce production cuts and rebalance the market.
The oil market's lack of reaction to the events in Venezuela demonstrates a key principle: short-to-medium term prices are driven by current production and delivery capacity, not the theoretical size of underground reserves that may take years and billions to develop.
The crude oil market is trapped in a recurring monthly pattern. For the first half of each month, the forward curve weakens on fears of a supply glut, nearly flipping into contango. Then, a sudden geopolitical shock mid-month causes the curve to snap back into pronounced backwardation, delaying the surplus.
A potential price collapse will be averted by the market's own circular logic. Sub-$60 prices will stimulate an extra 500,000 barrels per day of demand from price-sensitive regions while simultaneously forcing high-cost non-OPEC producers to shut down production, creating a natural market equilibrium.
The market has a natural floor. For U.S. shale, a WTI price of $47 represents a zero-return level where drilling and completions halt. For Russia, a Brent price below $42 means operators face negative margins, forcing well shut-ins and providing a backstop against a complete price collapse.
The 30-50 million barrels of Venezuelan oil the White House claims to be releasing is not new supply. It's largely oil that was already produced but couldn't be exported due to the U.S. blockade. Releasing it is more of a reversal of a self-inflicted disruption than an injection of fresh barrels into the market.
Despite his stated goal of lowering oil prices, President Trump's aggressive sanctions on Venezuela, Iran, and Russia have removed significant supply from the market. This creates logistical bottlenecks and "oil on water" buildups, effectively tightening the market and keeping prices higher than they would be otherwise.
By consolidating influence over Venezuelan and Guyanese reserves alongside its own, the U.S. could control nearly a third of global oil reserves. This would fundamentally reshape energy geopolitics, diminishing the influence of powers like Saudi Arabia and potentially keeping oil prices in a lower range.