The oil market's lack of reaction to the events in Venezuela demonstrates a key principle: short-to-medium term prices are driven by current production and delivery capacity, not the theoretical size of underground reserves that may take years and billions to develop.

Related Insights

While beneficial for U.S. refiners, a resurgence in Venezuelan production could harm U.S. shale producers. They would face not only lower overall oil prices but also a potential shift in marginal supply growth away from shale towards Venezuela over the next decade, diminishing their market position.

Despite healthy global oil demand, J.P. Morgan maintains a bearish outlook because supply is forecast to expand at three times the rate of demand. This oversupply creates such a large market imbalance that prices must fall to enforce production cuts and rebalance the market.

Chevron's decision to remain in Venezuela, unlike other oil majors, isn't just about future potential. It's heavily influenced by massive, decades-long sunk costs, including U.S. Gulf Coast refineries specifically optimized to process Venezuela's unique heavy sour crude.

Despite major political upheaval in Venezuela, the oil market's reaction is minimal. This is because the short-term supply impact is ambiguous, with an equal probability of production increasing through U.S. re-engagement or decreasing due to intensified blockades, creating a balanced risk profile.

Contrary to bearish sentiment, oil demand has consistently exceeded expectations. The market's weakness stems from a supply glut, primarily from the Americas, which has outpaced demand growth by more than twofold, leading to a structural surplus and significant inventory builds.

Despite holding the world's largest oil reserves (17%), Venezuela's contribution to global production is minimal (<1%). This critical gap between reserves and output explains why major geopolitical events in the country have little immediate impact on global oil supply or prices.

A potential price collapse will be averted by the market's own circular logic. Sub-$60 prices will stimulate an extra 500,000 barrels per day of demand from price-sensitive regions while simultaneously forcing high-cost non-OPEC producers to shut down production, creating a natural market equilibrium.

Unlike more volatile shale production, large-scale offshore projects from Exxon in Guyana and Petrobras in Brazil are sanctioned years in advance. This provides analysts with a highly reliable and visible pipeline of new, low-cost barrels, cementing the forecast for a sustained supply surplus.

The hosts argue that even with vast oil reserves and government encouragement, the political instability, power vacuum, and lack of rule of law in Venezuela make it a poor investment for oil companies. The cost and uncertainty of securing profits are too high.

The widely cited 300 billion barrel figure for Venezuela's oil reserves is not a measure of what's currently extractable. True "proven reserves" are a function of oil price, investment, and security, making the economically viable amount far lower than the technical potential.

Oil Markets Ignored Maduro's Arrest, Proving Production Capacity Trumps Reserve Size | RiffOn