Despite tariffs making imports more expensive, moving furniture production back to the US is seen as unrealistic. The primary obstacle is not financial, but a critical shortage of trained workers who can and want to do the work, a deficit that tariffs cannot fix.
Related Insights
The reshoring trend isn't about replicating traditional manufacturing. Instead, the U.S. gains a competitive advantage by leveraging automation and robotics, effectively trading labor costs for electricity costs. This strategy directly challenges global regions that rely on exporting cheap human labor.
The decline in U.S. manufacturing isn't just about labor costs. A crucial, overlooked factor is the disparity in savings. While Americans consumed, nations like China saved and invested in capital goods like factories, making their labor more productive and thus more attractive for manufacturing investment.
A return to the 1990s boom in mass-produced furniture is unrealistic. The future of the American industry lies in smaller, efficient factories with high-skilled workers trained in areas like computer-assisted design, focusing on high-end, custom pieces.
Bringing manufacturing back to the US won't mean a return of old assembly line jobs. The real opportunity is to leapfrog to automated factories that produce sophisticated, tech-infused products. This creates a new class of higher-skill, higher-pay "blue collar plus" jobs focused on building and maintaining these advanced manufacturing systems.
To compete with China in manufacturing, the US can't rely on labor volume but on productivity from AI and robotics. This requires eliminating the friction of distance between R&D talent (in the Bay Area) and factory floors, making talent-proximate manufacturing parks a strategic necessity.
Arm's CEO argues the US has lost its 'muscle memory' for 24/7 manufacturing. The core issue is cultural: manufacturing isn't seen as a prestigious career, unlike in Taiwan where working for TSMC is highly esteemed. This cultural gap is a major hurdle for onshoring efforts.
Instead of trying to reclaim low-cost assembly jobs, the U.S. should leapfrog to advanced manufacturing for complex future products like robots and electric vehicles. This strategy creates a new category of higher-skill, higher-paying "blue collar plus" jobs that are more resilient to offshoring.
The national initiative to reshore manufacturing faces a critical human capital problem: a shortage of skilled tradespeople like electricians and plumbers. The decline of vocational training in high schools (e.g., "shop class") has created a talent gap that must be addressed to build and run new factories.
The US labor market is stuck in a 'low hire, low fire' mode, preventing a more robust recovery. This stagnation is not from a lack of demand but is directly attributed to the combined effects of restrictive immigration controls and the lingering impact of tariffs, which suppress hiring activity and consumer purchasing power.
Ford's CEO highlights a national crisis: a severe shortage of essential blue-collar workers like technicians and construction workers. He argues society overvalues white-collar paths and must reinvest in trade schools and restore the dignity of these critical, well-paying jobs.
