Arm's CEO argues the US has lost its 'muscle memory' for 24/7 manufacturing. The core issue is cultural: manufacturing isn't seen as a prestigious career, unlike in Taiwan where working for TSMC is highly esteemed. This cultural gap is a major hurdle for onshoring efforts.
Related Insights
Onshoring is not possible by replicating China's labor-intensive model, making autonomous robots a necessity. Simultaneously, the strategic, dual-use nature of this technology makes it imperative to develop these robots domestically. This creates a powerful feedback loop where the technology enables onshoring while the need for the technology drives it.
Bringing manufacturing back to the US won't mean a return of old assembly line jobs. The real opportunity is to leapfrog to automated factories that produce sophisticated, tech-infused products. This creates a new class of higher-skill, higher-pay "blue collar plus" jobs focused on building and maintaining these advanced manufacturing systems.
Critical manufacturing expertise is not easily codified in manuals; it's tacit knowledge embedded in experienced teams. Offshoring production leads to an irreversible loss of this 'process capital,' hindering a nation's ability to innovate and scale complex industries, as demonstrated by the transfer of German rocket scientists after WWII.
To find the leading edge of US reshoring, look beyond traditional industrial firms. Major technology companies like the "Mag7" are now aggressively hiring top-tier physical AI, robotics, and manufacturing talent. This signals a fundamental shift in where the most significant capital and innovation in US manufacturing are being directed.
Software companies struggle to build their own chips because their agile, sprint-based culture clashes with hardware development's demands. Chip design requires a "measure twice, cut once" mentality, as mistakes cost months and millions. This cultural mismatch is a primary reason for failure, even with immense resources.
To compete with China in manufacturing, the US can't rely on labor volume but on productivity from AI and robotics. This requires eliminating the friction of distance between R&D talent (in the Bay Area) and factory floors, making talent-proximate manufacturing parks a strategic necessity.
The belief that China's manufacturing advantage is cheap labor is dangerously outdated. Its true dominance lies in a 20-year head start on manufacturing autonomy, with production for complex products like the PlayStation 5 being 90% automated. The US outsourced innovation instead of automating domestically.
Instead of trying to reclaim low-cost assembly jobs, the U.S. should leapfrog to advanced manufacturing for complex future products like robots and electric vehicles. This strategy creates a new category of higher-skill, higher-paying "blue collar plus" jobs that are more resilient to offshoring.
The national initiative to reshore manufacturing faces a critical human capital problem: a shortage of skilled tradespeople like electricians and plumbers. The decline of vocational training in high schools (e.g., "shop class") has created a talent gap that must be addressed to build and run new factories.
While the West may lead in AI models, China's key strategic advantage is its ability to 'embody' AI in hardware. Decades of de-industrialization in the U.S. have left a gap, while China's manufacturing dominance allows it to integrate AI into cars, drones, and robots at a scale the West cannot currently match.