Courage cannot be demanded or simply listed as a corporate value. A leader's key role is to be a 'context architect,' creating the organizational conditions for brave behavior. This includes allowing for failure, resourcing experimentation, and embodying courage personally, thereby enabling the entire organization to act bravely.
Related Insights
Brené Brown's research shows courage can be learned, measured, and observed rather than being an innate quality. It comprises four skills, starting with clarifying and operationalizing your values. This makes leadership development more tangible and less about inherent personality traits.
Instead of trying to convince people of the importance of vulnerability, first have them identify their core values. They will naturally conclude that living up to those values (e.g., courage, excellence) requires them to embrace the uncertainty and risk inherent in vulnerability.
Innovation requires psychological safety. When employees are afraid to speak up or make mistakes, they become "armored" and growth stagnates. To unlock potential, leaders must create environments where the joy of creation and contribution outweighs the fear of failure.
True innovation requires leaders to adopt a venture capital mindset, accepting that roughly nine out of ten initiatives will fail. This high tolerance for failure, mirroring professional investment odds, is a prerequisite for the psychological safety needed for breakthrough results.
Contrary to the 'lone hero' myth, courage is a collective effort. Leaders should intentionally seek out four distinct types of support: moral (encouragement), informational (data), resource (tools/funding), and appraisal (constructive feedback). This network provides the foundation for making bold decisions.
Contrary to common belief, feeling fear is not what prevents leaders from being courageous. The real barrier is the defensive "armor"—behaviors like micromanagement or feigned intensity—that leaders adopt when afraid. The path to courage involves identifying and shedding this armor, not eliminating fear.
Instead of waiting for a complete picture, courageous leaders take small, experimental actions to 'sense make' their way through ambiguity. This process, observed in emergency responders, involves acting, observing cues, and rapidly iterating. It is about learning by doing, not planning everything perfectly in advance.
When an experimental campaign failed, Edelman's CEO Richard Edelman protected the mid-level employee responsible. He framed the mistake as a necessary cost of innovation in a new field, explicitly telling the team to "keep pushing boundaries." This response fosters a culture where calculated risks are encouraged rather than punished.
Creating an environment where people feel safe to speak up requires more than just asking for it. Leaders must actively model the desired behavior. This includes admitting their own mistakes, asking questions they worry might be "dumb," and framing their own actions as experiments to show that learning and failure are acceptable.
To foster an innovative team that takes big swings, leaders must create a culture of psychological safety. Team members must know they won't be fired for a failed experiment. Instead, failures should be treated as learning opportunities, encouraging them to be edgier and push boundaries.
