When owned by multiple private equity firms with varying exit horizons, IFS mitigates conflicting priorities by ensuring acquisition targets, even strategic ones, have a robust business plan to achieve profitability within 18 months to two years.
Related Insights
Premira's value creation aims to produce 'better' companies, defined by higher quality revenue and faster growth rates at exit than at entry, even at a larger scale. This involves strategic shifts like moving to a cloud model or significant geographic expansion.
Given private equity's finite 5-7 year investment hold period, the 80/20 principle is an essential framework. It forces leadership to ruthlessly prioritize by identifying and doubling down on the 20% of customers, markets, leads, or team members that drive 80% of the results.
A compressed diligence process relies heavily on projections. A superior approach is building a relationship over 1-2 years, which allows an investor to witness the company's actual execution against its stated goals, providing far greater conviction than any financial model.
IFS uses a framework of four deal archetypes—Product Bolt-on, Customer Migration, Market Entry, and New Strategic Platform—to clarify the investment rationale and pre-determine the integration strategy for every acquisition, ensuring strategic alignment from the start.
Instead of a traditional 100-day plan, TA Associates' value creation process begins by defining what the business must look like in five years to achieve a successful exit. All subsequent initiatives are then mapped backward from this end goal, ensuring every action is aligned with the ultimate liquidity event.
The value creation process begins long before the deal closes. The 3-6 month due diligence period is used for weakness identification, strategic planning, and recruiting key personnel. This makes the post-acquisition 100-day plan a seamless continuation of pre-close work, rather than a fresh start.
A profitable business can be a bad investment if it creates unsustainable operational stress. This non-financial "return on headache" is a key metric for evaluating small business acquisitions, especially for hands-on owner-operators who must live with the daily consequences.
When evaluating a deal, sophisticated LPs look beyond diversifying customers and suppliers. They analyze the number of viable exit channels. A company whose only realistic exit path is an IPO faces significant hold period risk if public markets turn, making exit diversification a key resiliency metric.
For certain acquisitions like Poker, IFS deliberately avoids full integration to retain the target's agile, entrepreneurial culture. Instead, they use product connectors and provide access to parent company resources, allowing the startup to maintain its dynamism while leveraging scale.