When a private equity firm sells a passive stake of itself (the GP) to a large investor, it's often a negative signal. This ownership change frequently triggers a shift towards asset gathering and strategy proliferation, diluting the focus that generated the initial "great funds."
When evaluating a deal, sophisticated LPs look beyond diversifying customers and suppliers. They analyze the number of viable exit channels. A company whose only realistic exit path is an IPO faces significant hold period risk if public markets turn, making exit diversification a key resiliency metric.
Rather than competing in crowded auctions, elite private equity firms pursue a differentiated "executive new build" strategy. They partner with proven operators to build new companies from scratch to address a market need, creating proprietary deals that other firms cannot access.
General Partners (GPs) prioritize speed and certainty when allocating co-investment opportunities. LPs who build a reputation for fast, reliable decision-making can punch far above their weight, gaining access to deals disproportionate to their fund commitment size.
During due diligence, the most revealing portfolio company reference checks involve asking CEOs leading questions. Frame inquiries to suggest the private equity sponsor is taking undue credit for successes. This tactic encourages frankness and uncovers the true dynamics of value creation and deal sourcing.
When assessing a co-investment, LPs should request data on employee participation. Deals where the PE firm's own staff invest their personal capital tend to be the better-performing ones, serving as a powerful, internal signal of conviction that goes beyond the official pitch.