Accepting a government salary fundamentally changes an advisor's role into that of an employee, creating an obligation of loyalty that compromises intellectual honesty. To provide unvarnished, objective advice to leaders, an advisor must remain financially independent from the government.
Despite being a recommendations-focused newsletter, Blackbird Spyplane forgoes lucrative affiliate links. This clarifies their business model, ensuring their only obligation is to paying readers. This removes conflicts of interest and builds unimpeachable trust, which they see as their core asset.
A top copywriter declined a major Harry Potter project because she had no personal connection to the universe. Protecting a brand's legacy and respecting its audience is paramount, even if it means sacrificing a high-profile job. This honesty builds long-term trust.
Critical media narratives targeting experienced tech leaders in government aim to intimidate future experts from public service. By framing deep industry experience as an inherent conflict of interest, these stories create a vacuum filled by less-qualified academics and career politicians, ultimately harming the quality of policymaking.
A business school professor's expertise is validated by the free market, not just the university. If they are truly skilled, they should command a seven-figure income from external opportunities like books, speaking, and consulting. Their university salary should only represent a small fraction (15-20%) of their total earnings.
Anduril advocates for performance-based contracts, a controversial model in government where payment is contingent on the product working. This forces internal accountability and aligns their interests with the customer's, contrasting with traditional cost-plus models that place all risk on the government.
The US has historically benefited from a baseline level of high competence in its government officials, regardless of party. This tradition is now eroding, being replaced by a focus on loyalty over expertise. This degradation from competence to acolytes poses a significant, underrecognized threat to national stability and global standing.
Policymakers and experts who have a track record of success in high-stakes financial markets (risking their own money) possess a practical understanding that academics often lack. Being a market 'gladiator' with real wins and losses is a more reliable indicator of economic competence than credentials alone.
No matter how intelligent you are, personal bias clouds judgment. For all significant decisions—personal, professional, or economic—consult a trusted "kitchen cabinet" of objective advisors. This external perspective is crucial for sound decision-making and protects against isolated thinking.
Financially independent politicians have an "escape hatch" unavailable to careerists. When faced with intense political pressure, isolation from their party, and public attacks, they can simply choose to leave. The misery of politics is judged against the alternative of a comfortable life, making resignation a constant temptation.
An effective governance model involves successful private sector leaders doing a "tour of duty" in government. This brings valuable, real-world expertise to policymaking. While critics cite conflicts of interest, the benefit is having qualified individuals shape regulations for national benefit, rather than career bureaucrats.