Unlike industries such as biotech, major tech companies and hyperscalers largely avoid suing each other over intellectual property. There is a prevailing ethos to compete on business execution and product offerings rather than through litigation. This cultural norm shapes how innovation spreads and is adopted across the industry, with features often being copied without legal challenge.
Related Insights
Bill Gurley argues that a sophisticated defensive move for giants like Amazon or Apple would be to collaboratively support a powerful open-source AI model. This counterintuitive strategy prevents a single competitor (like Microsoft/OpenAI) from gaining an insurmountable proprietary advantage that threatens their core businesses.
Intense competition forces companies to innovate their products and marketing more aggressively. This rivalry validates the market's potential, accelerates its growth, and ultimately benefits the entire ecosystem and its customers, rather than being a purely zero-sum game.
Incumbents are disincentivized from creating cheaper, superior products that would cannibalize existing high-margin revenue streams. Organizational silos also hinder the creation of blended solutions that cross traditional product lines, creating opportunities for startups to innovate in the gaps.
Contrary to the expectation of fierce rivalry, startups in crowded spaces like voice AI within the same YC batch often form collaborative groups. They share learnings on common technical hurdles, turning potential competition into a support system.
While network effects drive consolidation in tech, a powerful counter-force prevents monopolies. Large enterprise customers intentionally support multiple major players (e.g., AWS, GCP, Azure) to avoid vendor lock-in and maintain negotiating power, naturally creating a market with two to three leaders.
Venture investors aren't concerned when a portfolio company launches products that compete with their other investments. This is viewed as a positive signal of a massive winner—a company so dominant it expands into adjacent categories, which is the ultimate goal.
The "golden era" of big tech AI labs publishing open research is over. As firms realize the immense value of their proprietary models and talent, they are becoming as secretive as trading firms. The culture is shifting toward protecting IP, with top AI researchers even discussing non-competes, once a hallmark of finance.
Sam Altman argues that the key to winning is not a single feature but the ability to repeatedly innovate first. Competitors who copy often replicate design mistakes and are always a step behind, making cloning a poor long-term strategy for them.
The AI lobby's argument to ignore IP rights to outpace China is shortsighted. The US's global strength is built on robust IP protection. Eroding this standard domestically jeopardizes the ability to protect American innovations, like OpenAI's own models, abroad. Respecting IP is the long-term strategic play.
Disney is licensing its IP to OpenAI, avoiding the "Napster trap" where music labels sued file-sharing services into bankruptcy but lost control of the streaming market. By partnering, Disney shapes the use of its IP in AI and benefits financially, rather than fighting a losing legal battle against technology's advance.
