The 'Office Plus Two' refers to how someone of average attractiveness (a '6') can become an '8' through repeated exposure in a workplace. This phenomenon also works in reverse, creating 'Office Minus Twos'. Over time, proximity doesn't just increase liking; it amplifies and diversifies feelings, leading to a wider spread of opinions.

Related Insights

Contrary to evolutionary psychology's emphasis on matching 'mate value' (e.g., a 7 with a 7), research shows that mismatched couples (e.g., an 8 with a 5 in attractiveness) are no more likely to break up, be unhappy, or cheat. The initial perceived value difference does not predict long-term relationship success.

Our personal tastes are highly malleable and heavily shaped by our social environment. The guest, Emily Falk, initially found actor Benedict Cumberbatch average-looking. However, after exposure to a book, her partner, and friends who all found him attractive, her own perception shifted dramatically. This demonstrates that our brain's "social relevance system" can override our initial, independent judgments.

Beyond productivity, the physical office plays a vital societal role. Gensler's survey data shows it's a primary venue where people form relationships with those outside their immediate demographic (race, age, religion). This makes the workplace a critical tool for fostering social cohesion in an increasingly polarized world.

Fame or renown, even on a small scale, is a more powerful tool for attraction than wealth. Being the 'contextual alpha'—the center of attention in a specific environment like an actor on stage or a musician at an open mic—creates a powerful status hierarchy that is highly attractive, regardless of one's financial standing.

Your internal emotional state is transmitted to others, even when you try to hide it. Behavioral investigator Vanessa Van Edwards found that subtle micro-expressions induce the same feelings in others, causing them to form a negative or positive opinion about you within the first few seconds of an interaction.

Our brains are wired to respond less to constant stimuli, a process called habituation. This is why the joy from a new job, a great view, or a loving relationship can fade over time. What was once amazing becomes normal, diminishing its impact on our daily happiness.

Beyond the involved couple, office romances between managers and subordinates have a tangible cost: a four-employee reduction in retention over four years. This turnover is highest in smaller firms and when favoritism (via pay bumps) is more obvious, suggesting perceived unfairness drives colleagues away.

To maintain relationship stability, people in committed relationships unconsciously deploy a 'pro-relationship bias.' They automatically perceive attractive alternative partners as less appealing than they actually are. This psychological defense mechanism downgrades temptations and helps insulate the relationship from outside threats.

The idea of a universal attractiveness scale (e.g., '10s' vs. '2s') only applies to initial encounters with strangers. As people get to know each other over time, their opinions on who is attractive diverge significantly. This allows individuals to find partners they personally rate as a '10', even if others don't agree.

While basic self-care is beneficial, the relentless focus on self-improvement to increase 'mate value' has limited returns. A more effective strategy is to focus on expanding social networks and participating in activities with repeat exposure (sports leagues, classes). These environments allow idiosyncratic attraction to develop, giving more people a chance at connection.