Many users blame AI tools for generic designs when the real issue is a poorly defined initial prompt. Using a preparatory GPT to outline user goals, needs, and flows ensures a strong starting point, preventing the costly and circular revisions that stem from a vague beginning.

To get superior results from AI coding agents, treat them like human developers by providing a detailed plan. Creating a Product Requirements Document (PRD) upfront leads to a more focused and accurate MVP, saving significant time on debugging and revisions later on.

While Claude's built-in 'create skill' tool is clunky, its output reveals a highly structured template for effective prompts. It includes decision trees, clarifying questions for the user, and keywords for invocation, serving as an invaluable guide for building robust skills without starting from scratch.

When stuck on product direction, use a simple prompt like "add five new features." The AI acts as a creative partner, generating ideas you may not have considered. Even if most are discarded, this technique can spark inspiration and uncover valuable additions.

Don't ask an AI agent to build an entire product at once. Structure your plan as a series of features. For each step, have the AI build the feature, then immediately write a test for it. The AI should only proceed to the next feature once the current one passes its test.

Use the Claude chat application for deep research on technical architecture and best practices *before* coding. It can research topics for over 10 minutes, providing a well-summarized plan that you can then feed into a dedicated coding tool like Cursor or Claude Code for implementation.

Instead of providing a vague functional description, feed prototyping AIs a detailed JSON data model first. This separates data from UI generation, forcing the AI to build a more realistic and higher-quality experience around concrete data, avoiding ambiguity and poor assumptions.

Instead of just asking an AI to write a PRD, first provide it with a "Socratic questioning" template. The LLM will then act as a thinking partner, asking challenging, open-ended questions about the problem and solution. This upfront thinking process results in a significantly more robust final document.

Instead of writing detailed Product Requirement Documents (PRDs), use a brief prompt with an AI tool like Vercel's v0. The generated prototype immediately reveals gaps and unstated assumptions in your thinking, allowing you to refine requirements based on the AI's 'misinterpretations' before creating a clearer final spec.