Instead of just asking an AI to write a PRD, first provide it with a "Socratic questioning" template. The LLM will then act as a thinking partner, asking challenging, open-ended questions about the problem and solution. This upfront thinking process results in a significantly more robust final document.
Related Insights
AI prototyping doesn't replace the PRD; it transforms its purpose. Instead of being a static document, the PRD's rich context and user stories become the ideal 'master prompt' to feed into an AI tool, ensuring the initial design is grounded in strategic requirements.
Instead of prompting a specialized AI tool directly, experts employ a meta-workflow. They first use a general LLM like ChatGPT or Claude to generate a detailed, context-rich 'master prompt' based on a PRD or user story, which they then paste into the specialized tool for superior results.
A powerful workflow is to explicitly instruct your AI to act as a collaborative thinking partner—asking questions and organizing thoughts—while strictly forbidding it from creating final artifacts. This separates the crucial thinking phase from the generative phase, leading to better outcomes.
When a prompt yields poor results, use a meta-prompting technique. Feed the failing prompt back to the AI, describe the incorrect output, specify the desired outcome, and explicitly grant it permission to rewrite, add, or delete. The AI will then debug and improve its own instructions.
AI models tend to be overly optimistic. To get a balanced market analysis, explicitly instruct AI research tools like Perplexity to act as a "devil's advocate." This helps uncover risks, challenge assumptions, and makes it easier for product managers to say "no" to weak ideas quickly.
The prompts for your "LLM as a judge" evals function as a new form of PRD. They explicitly define the desired behavior, edge cases, and quality standards for your AI agent. Unlike static PRDs, these are living documents, derived from real user data and are constantly, automatically testing if the product meets its requirements.
A powerful but unintuitive AI development pattern is to give a model a vague goal and let it attempt a full implementation. This "throwaway" draft, with its mistakes and unexpected choices, provides crucial insights for writing a much more accurate plan for the final version.
Instead of writing detailed Product Requirement Documents (PRDs), use a brief prompt with an AI tool like Vercel's v0. The generated prototype immediately reveals gaps and unstated assumptions in your thinking, allowing you to refine requirements based on the AI's 'misinterpretations' before creating a clearer final spec.
Instead of immediately building, engage AI in a Socratic dialogue. Set rules like "ask one question at a time" and "probe assumptions." This structured conversation clarifies the problem and user scenarios, essentially replacing initial team brainstorming sessions and creating a better final prompt for prototyping tools.
To prevent AI coding assistants from hallucinating, developer Terry Lynn uses a two-step process. First, an AI generates a Product Requirements Document (PRD). Then, a separate AI "reviewer" rates the PRD's clarity out of 10, identifying gaps before any code is written, ensuring a higher rate of successful execution.
