Many users blame AI tools for generic designs when the real issue is a poorly defined initial prompt. Using a preparatory GPT to outline user goals, needs, and flows ensures a strong starting point, preventing the costly and circular revisions that stem from a vague beginning.
Related Insights
AI prototyping doesn't replace the PRD; it transforms its purpose. Instead of being a static document, the PRD's rich context and user stories become the ideal 'master prompt' to feed into an AI tool, ensuring the initial design is grounded in strategic requirements.
Instead of prompting a specialized AI tool directly, experts employ a meta-workflow. They first use a general LLM like ChatGPT or Claude to generate a detailed, context-rich 'master prompt' based on a PRD or user story, which they then paste into the specialized tool for superior results.
Instead of spending time trying to craft the perfect prompt from scratch, provide a basic one and then ask the AI a simple follow-up: "What do you need from me to improve this prompt?" The AI will then list the specific context and details it requires, turning prompt engineering into a simple Q&A session.
Achieve higher-quality results by using an AI to first generate an outline or plan. Then, refine that plan with follow-up prompts before asking for the final execution. This course-corrects early and avoids wasted time on flawed one-shot outputs, ultimately saving time.
Even for a simple personal project, starting with a Product Requirements Document (PRD) dramatically improves the output from AI code generation tools. Taking a few minutes to outline goals and features provides the necessary context for the AI to produce more accurate and relevant code, saving time on rework.
Instead of struggling to craft an effective prompt, users can ask the AI to generate it for them. Describe your goal and ask ChatGPT to 'write me the perfect ChatGPT prompt for this with exact wording, format, and style.' This meta-prompting technique leverages the AI's own capabilities for better results.
The effectiveness of AI tools like ChatGPT depends entirely on the quality of the initial inputs. To get exceptional results, "brief" the AI by uploading foundational documents like your company manifesto, jobs-to-be-done, and brand positioning. A lazy or generic prompt yields generic results.
A powerful but unintuitive AI development pattern is to give a model a vague goal and let it attempt a full implementation. This "throwaway" draft, with its mistakes and unexpected choices, provides crucial insights for writing a much more accurate plan for the final version.
To avoid generic, 'purple AI slop' UIs, create a custom design system for your AI tool. Use 'reverse prompting': feed an LLM like ChatGPT screenshots of a target app (e.g., Uber) and ask it to extrapolate the foundational design system (colors, typography). Use this output as a custom instruction.
Instead of immediately building, engage AI in a Socratic dialogue. Set rules like "ask one question at a time" and "probe assumptions." This structured conversation clarifies the problem and user scenarios, essentially replacing initial team brainstorming sessions and creating a better final prompt for prototyping tools.
