Use the Claude chat application for deep research on technical architecture and best practices *before* coding. It can research topics for over 10 minutes, providing a well-summarized plan that you can then feed into a dedicated coding tool like Cursor or Claude Code for implementation.

Related Insights

The power of tools like Claude Code comes from giving the AI access to fundamental command-line tools (e.g., `bash`, `grep`). This allows the AI to compose novel solutions and lets product teams define new features using simple English prompts rather than hard-coded logic.

Instead of prompting a specialized AI tool directly, experts employ a meta-workflow. They first use a general LLM like ChatGPT or Claude to generate a detailed, context-rich 'master prompt' based on a PRD or user story, which they then paste into the specialized tool for superior results.

A repeatable workflow exists for non-technical builders: research ideas with Perplexity, formalize a Product Requirements Document with Claude, generate a frontend prototype with Magic Patterns, and then deploy the code in Replit with a Supabase backend.

LLMs often get stuck or pursue incorrect paths on complex tasks. "Plan mode" forces Claude Code to present its step-by-step checklist for your approval before it starts editing files. This allows you to correct its logic and assumptions upfront, ensuring the final output aligns with your intent and saving time.

Claude Code's terminal-based interaction within a specific folder allows it to automatically read and reference local files. This makes "context engineering" drastically faster and more powerful than manually pasting information into a traditional chat interface, as the context is implicitly understood.

Including the special keyword "ultra think" in a prompt signals Claude Code to engage in a more intensive thought process. This undocumented feature can significantly improve the quality of output for difficult bugs or complex tasks without noticeably impacting token usage.

Instead of asking an AI to directly build something, the more effective approach is to instruct it on *how* to solve the problem: gather references, identify best-in-class libraries, and create a framework before implementation. This means working one level of abstraction higher than the code itself.

Use Claude's "Artifacts" feature to generate interactive, LLM-powered application prototypes directly from a prompt. This allows product managers to test the feel and flow of a conversational AI, including latency and response length, without needing API keys or engineering support, bridging the gap between a static mock and a coded MVP.

Don't pay for Claude's most expensive tier just for coding. A hybrid approach uses the cheaper Claude Pro plan for its superior file-handling and writing. For heavy coding, switch to the terminal inside Cursor, which provides access to top models like Opus for only $20/month, creating a powerful stack for under $40.

Instead of using Claude's slow and error-prone web UI to generate skills, a more effective workflow is to use an AI-native code editor like Cursor. By providing Cursor with the official documentation link, it can rapidly and reliably generate the entire skill folder structure, including markdown and validation scripts.