When employees feel excluded, the consequence isn't just passive disengagement. It can breed resentment that leads them to withhold crucial ideas, watch things fail without intervening, or even actively work against the organization's interests. Exclusion creates a tangible cost and risk.
Related Insights
Leaders should anticipate active sabotage, not just passive resistance, when implementing AI. A significant percentage of employees, fearing replacement or feeling inferior to the technology, will actively undermine AI projects, leading to an estimated 80% failure rate for these initiatives.
Businesses invest heavily in recruiting top talent but then micromanage them, preventing them from using their full cognitive abilities. This creates a transactional environment where employees don't contribute their best ideas, leaving significant value unrealized.
Innovation is stifled when team members, especially junior ones, don't feel safe to contribute. Without psychological safety, potentially industry-defining ideas are never voiced for fear of judgment. This makes it a critical business issue, not just a 'soft' HR concept.
A leader's attempt to increase velocity by streamlining hiring (e.g., cutting interview rounds) can be misread by the team. What the leader sees as efficiency, employees may perceive as being excluded, making them question if their voice and judgment still matter in the company.
A leader's failure to deliver difficult feedback, even with good intentions, doesn't protect employees. It fosters entitlement in the underperformer and resentment in the leader, leading to a toxic dynamic and an inevitable, messy separation. True kindness is direct, constructive feedback.
Leaders who always have the right answer often create an environment where others feel devalued and excluded. The blocker's real cost is not the accuracy of their ideas, but the damage done to team connection and collaborative decision-making, which prevents the team from arriving at the best solutions together.
Refusing to discuss fear and feelings at work is inefficient. Leaders must invest a reasonable amount of time proactively attending to team emotions or be forced to squander an unreasonable amount of time reacting to the negative behaviors that result from those unaddressed feelings.
Distrust on teams isn't a single event but a progression. It begins with Defensiveness (an early warning), moves to Disengagement (withdrawal), and ends in Disenchantment (actively turning others against leadership). Leaders must intervene in the defensiveness phase before the damage becomes irreversible.
A key stakeholder within a client account may actively create friction and gaslight your team, not for legitimate business reasons, but to steer the contract towards a competitor where a friend works. This form of psychological warfare can derail renewals despite strong performance.
'Hidden blockers' like micromanagement or a need to always be right rarely stem from negative intent. They are often deep-seated, counterproductive strategies to fulfill fundamental human needs for value, safety, or belonging. Identifying the underlying need is the first step toward finding a healthier way to meet it.